It's tenuous and adds no value because the article doesn't mention electric vehicles at any point and so far has proven to not be true.
So we wait for it to happen for it to be proven to be true? I recall UK blackouts in the 70's - so it is true on this basis.
You're also ignoring the fact that you don't need to permanently charge electric vehicles. They retain charge in exactly the same way as you retain petrol in a tank. So unless the blackouts are exceptionally long it wouldn't be an issue for the majority of vehicles.
I seem to be ignoring many things, would you like to list ALL the things related to this debate that I am ignoring?
My father's BMW i3 will lose 25-30% of its range in sub zero weather (from around 130 miles down to 90 miles), so that is a factor. The i3 is a Hybrid though so could run indefinitely on petrol if required, albeit it with much limited range between petrol fills, but for his use case it won't matter if we have extended blackouts as he is retired and elderly and doesn't need to drive anywhere far with urgency (unless it's the hospital). So he can sit on his battery charge (assuming he knew a blackout was coming and he remembered to plug-in to the charger to top it up).
Pure electric EVs are stuck with an in-built battery storage only with no chance of backup, does that mean that the most advanced and expensive EV available has a range of 300-400 miles in warm weather or 200-300 in Winter, I'm not sure as I haven't researched? Not many people can afford an EV outright, never mind a 50-100KWh battery bank extended range backup needed to charge off-grid.
What happens to battery range as it ages? 80% after 10 years? Where are we at with the technology at the moment?
Additionally blackouts would also prevent you filling up a petrol or diesel vehicle as the pumps wouldn't operate (amongst a whole host of other issues as
@Bernie highlights) so it's completely wrong to suggest this is a downside of electric vehicles specifically.
I said it's a risk, not a downside, you are writing words into my responses. I view a risk as something to be assessed and mitigated against if necessary, hence I have 50 litres of diesel stored for each vehicle I own giving me a range of around 1000 miles per vehicle (starting with a full tank as well). Beyond this would mean we are in real trouble and I am unable to mitigate against further risk.
I suspect we will be in total chaos at this stage anyway, so if you haven't escaped to your yacht already, then just down all remaining homebrew stocks and kiss your ass goodbye.
It's already been discussed at least twice in this thread that EVs will not have a significant impact on grid capacity.
@Chippy_Tea's post a bit further up the page provides the details.
I'm unable to comment on the impact on the grid - yet I am sceptical of the marketing hype of media and governments and car salesmen who will paint a rosy picture of just about everything they impose, it's "all for our benefit and there are no downsides to even consider (or debate)."
"But look here's a bunch of stats that we've paid someone to produce that proves us right" - yeah right, that's worked well for every prediction of government bodies so far hasn't it