OVO Drive + Anytime . It’s a type of use not time of use tariff too. You have to have a compatible smart meter and car charger and anything that goes through that is 5p kwh.
That's tremendous. I'll have to look into that.
OVO Drive + Anytime . It’s a type of use not time of use tariff too. You have to have a compatible smart meter and car charger and anything that goes through that is 5p kwh.
I forgot to add a link to my earlier post, here is more of the article -It will be interesting to see if the trend is continuing like that now. Electricity costs three times as much now as it did in 2021.
I don't understand the hostility to diesel since it's thermodynamically more efficient than the petrol engine.By the end of 2022, it's projected that electric cars will outsell diesel and mild hybrid diesel. Petrol is set to remain the most popular fuel choice for used car buyers for the next few years, yet, while diesel is expected to become a niche choice over time as drivers opt for cleaner and cheaper plug-in alternatives.
https://heycar.co.uk/blog/electric-cars-statistics-and-projections
Unfortunately it's the nitrogen oxide emissions that are the problem with diesel engines. They emit approximately 30% more than petrol equivalents.I don't understand the hostility to diesel since it's thermodynamically more efficient than the petrol engine.
I don't understand the hostility to diesel since it's thermodynamically more efficient than the petrol engine.
Unfortunately it's the nitrogen oxide emissions that are the problem with diesel engines. They emit approximately 30% more than petrol equivalents.
Yep, it's bonkers. A 4.4l v8 Volvo XC90 - a 350bhp 2.5tonne tank that will struggle to do 15mph around town, is ulez compliant, but my wife's little Citroen diesel that easily does 60mpg around town isn't.Yes, diesels are frowned upon. My daughter has a 2011 plate Fiesta 1.4l diesel which does 60mpg but she has to pay £12.50 per day to enter the London ULEZ zone. On the other hand, a 2008 plate 3L V6 petrol Jaguar XF is ULEZ compliant and exempt from the charges
I appreciate that whether or not your car is exempt isn’t determined by how many mpg it does, but, like you say, is supposed to be there to lower pollution in the city. To that end, I can’t quite understand how a car that burns and pumps the exhaust from a gallon of fuel for every 60 miles it covers can be deemed to be cleaner than one that burns the same amount amount of fuel every 15 miles.ULEZ is to lower pollution in the city it has nothing to do with mpg, its personal choice if you want to drive a car rhat will only do 15mpg you have paid a much higher amount for your road fund licence and due to the amount of fuel you are using more in tax at the pump
Essentially this is the product of bad decisions that were made 10-15 years ago when diesels were thought to be the better solution due to their improved fuel efficiency.If diesel is really so bad then why do most of the public transport vehicles that we are all being encouraged to use instead run on it?!
Because the one that only does 15 to the gallon does less harm to air quality than the one that does 60.To that end, I can’t quite understand how a car that burns and pumps the exhaust from a gallon of fuel for every 60 miles it covers can be deemed to be cleaner than one that burns the same amount amount of fuel every 15 miles
it's why I love Japanese cars. As Jezza once said - The Germans give you what you want, the Japanese give you what you need
The high working temperature and high compression ratio of diesel engines lead to undesired reations like the oxidation of nitrogen. However, it's the high working temperature that makes this type of engine more efficient. Legal limits for pollutants from diesel engines are about 20% higher for diesel engines than those from petrol engines.Because the one that only does 15 to the gallon does less harm to air quality than the one that does 60.
. If we look at other sources of pollution, such as fine particles (like PM10, PM2.5, NO2 or NOx), it’s petrol that outperforms
Indeed, diesel engines have the uniqueness of requiring large amounts of air for fuel combustion to happen. The problem with this additional air is that it causes more chemical reactions, which release significant amounts of air pollutants.
I can’t believe we all fell for it. There’s no way any engine that fires a huge cloud of black smoke out of the exhaust as you start it up is going to be any good for the environmentEssentially this is the product of bad decisions that were made 10-15 years ago when diesels were thought to be the better solution due to their improved fuel efficiency.
That’s assuming that all busses are full and all cars are carrying a single passenger.In terms of public transport usage; one diesel bus has a considerably lower emissions impact than 100 single occupant diesel vehicles.
In terms of public transport usage; one diesel bus has a considerably lower emissions impact than 100 single occupant diesel vehicles.
True for the example as I wrote it but the logic still holds for a half full bus v. 25 cars with 2 passengers (albeit with a smaller margin in favour of the bus).That’s assuming that all busses are full and all cars are carrying a single passenger.
There’s no way any engine that fires a huge cloud of black smoke out of the exhaust as you start it up is going to be any good for the environment
Enter your email address to join: