PhilBrew
Landlord.
... I think you're right, but the problem is that the means of asking "all those who test positive" is the (agreed by just about everyone to be fundamentally flawed) "test, trace and isolate" system ... as far as I understand it, when a contact tracer contacts someone who has recently tested positive for COVID-19 what they will ask about is times/places where you've spent more than 15 minutes with anyone ... So, since the whole system of gathering data is discounting the "casual" interactions that those who have the virus have had with all sorts of other people, and only accounting for those "longer term" (social) interactions, guess what? People mixing with friends and family, either at home or in entertainment venues, will end up being the "main" way that the disease gets recorded as being transmittedI think it's a mathematical modeling thing, you know - ask all those who test positive where they have been for the last two weeks or whatever, collate all the data and look at patterns. Might be wrong.I always wondered how they associated blame to where the person contracted covid.
As an example, I could spend a whole afternoon, wandering around a town, going into different shops interacting with handfuls of people in those shops and passing dozens of people in streets moving around the town, but as far as the contact tracers (and the data of how/where the virus is spreading) is concerned, only the half an hour I spent sitting in a Costa/pub/whatever will be of interest
Cheers PhilB