- Joined
- Aug 12, 2015
- Messages
- 10,706
- Reaction score
- 10,579
No sorry a breakdown of where the deaths are.Sorry, Im not following. Do you mean are most people who are no longer obeying the lockdown in London?
No sorry a breakdown of where the deaths are.Sorry, Im not following. Do you mean are most people who are no longer obeying the lockdown in London?
No sorry a breakdown of where the deaths are.
I think the worst hit areas are in the north
What do you expect? Deaths will continue. The virus is still out there . It hasn't gone away. The best you can hope for is that people have the personal discipline and self responsibility to keep within the boundaries they have been allowed by the authorities as freedoms are reinstated. But since the average Brit is demonstrating how they will deal with that, don't expect too much.The deaths don't seem to be going down, and in London at least (- there was a massive protest in hyde park with reportedly thousands of people attending and from what ive seem myself) the lockdown is effectively over. From what I've read the 359 from yesterday is more deaths than EU27 combined.
I think the worst hit areas are in the north
Whilst the virus
What do you expect? Deaths will continue. The virus is still out there . It hasn't gone away. The best you can hope for is that people have the personal discipline and self responsibility to keep within the boundaries they have been allowed by the authorities as freedoms are reinstated. But since the average Brit is demonstrating how they will deal with that, don't expect too much.
Barrow-in-Furness (8 miles from where i live) was the worst for infections for a while -
The remote Cumbrian town with the UK's highest Covid-19 infection rate
Barrow-in-Furness has fewer visitors than the nearby Lake District, yet has one of the worst death rates outside London
It is one of the remotest towns in England, situated on a windy peninsula a 45-minute drive from the nearest motorway and receives a fraction of the visitors of the nearby Lake District. Yet Barrow-in-Furness in Cumbria has the highest coronavirus infection rate in the UK.
According to the latest government figures, 552 people in Barrow have so far been infected with Covid-19, a rate of 882.2 for every 100,000 people. To put that into context, the English average is 244.5 for every 100,000; Scotland’s is 250.6; Wales’ is 365.4 and Northern Ireland’s 220.5.
Sixty-one Barrovians had died from Covid-19 by 1 May, including Simon Guest, a much-loved radiographer at Furness general hospital. It is a lot in a town of 67,000 people, giving it a death rate of 91 for every 100,000, one of the worst outside of London.
“It is a big worry, especially with the lockdown being released on Wednesday,” said Lee Roberts, deputy leader of Barrow borough council, who complains he has not seen any data analysis looking into the figures.
The first person to die from Covid-19 in Barrow attended a house party in the town where at least five other people were infected, according to one expert familiar with the local infection pattern. The party took place before lockdown on 23 March and there is no suggestion the host or any guests were being reckless.
Quite how everyone else in Barrow got infected is not yet clear, according to Colin Cox, the director of public health for Cumbria. He said the high infection rate could in part be explained by the fact more people in Barrow have been tested than in other places.
“The rate of testing in Barrow has been two to three times higher than in many other parts of the north-west, so that will explain a fair chunk of it, but I don’t think it will explain all of it,” said Cox.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...est-covid-19-infection-rate-barrow-in-furness
I wonder what the breakdown is, are most in the capital?
NHS England Region | 28-May-20 |
England | 111 |
East Of England | 17 |
London | 6 |
Midlands | 25 |
North East And Yorkshire | 18 |
North West | 26 |
South East | 11 |
South West | 8 |
According to the Financial Times, if the UK recorded deaths in the same way as Spain, yesterday's UK total would have been...... 20.
More on hydroxychloroquine from a study based in Paris "The overall survival rate at day 21 was 89% in the [hydroxychloroquine] treatment group and 91% in the [group without hydroxychloroquine]". So yes, lots of people treated with hydroxychloroquine get better - but that's because they're also being given oxygen etc and not because of the hydroxychloroquine. Would you rather be in the group with 9% death rate or 11% death rate?
Also 10% of the hydroxychloroquine group had to stop treatment with hydroxychloroquine because of heart flutters.
No you shouldn't, I think it was Spain but can't be sure decided to not include 12k deaths on their total but it was weeks ago.A couple of people have said we cannot compare our figures to other countries and that we shouldn't nice to see the proof.
Indeed. It was in the Times today that Italy's excess deaths this year are 19,000 higher than their reported CV19 figures can account for.No you shouldn't, I think it was Spain but can't be sure decided to not include 12k deaths on their total but it was weeks ago.
Russia put pneumonia down as a death instead of covid. All things like that mean you cannot compare like for like. Not that it's a competition anyway as these are poor souls .
Either way the scale is not linear.
Financial Times has free access to their Covid-19 charts and articles. They have excess deaths for many countries. UK has nearly 60,000 deaths in excess of the normal rate. This is 65% more than before Covid-19.Indeed. It was in the Times today that Italy's excess deaths this year are 19,000 higher than their reported CV19 figures can account for.
Enter your email address to join: