This is almost certainly the case, like many TV and production staff.He could be a contractor. In which case, none of that would apply.
This is almost certainly the case, like many TV and production staff.He could be a contractor. In which case, none of that would apply.
I've already called out elsewhere, he doesn't and has never worked for the BBC.It's the BBC that is toxic time and time again and still they do not learn.
Ah well it's only tax payers money
But he appears on BBC channels, so it’s fair to question whether they are ensuring their suppliers are applying the appropriate standards,I've already called out elsewhere, he doesn't and has never worked for the BBC.
Yeah, you're right, but nothing wrong with giving him a final warning (and meaning it), contractor or not.He could be a contractor. In which case, none of that would apply.
Unfortunately at work there is always a hierarchy, that can force people to be 'in on it' or their position within the workplace can be questionedIt's all about context isn't it? I joke around with my female colleagues and vice versa saying things that we probably shouldn't, however it stays within the group. I wouldn't say that sort of stuff to someone who wasn't 'in on it'.
The BBC still have a care of duty to any BBC staff he comes into contact with even if he is contracted and to report any unsavoury comments made to anybody on their premises.
The BBC have time and time again mismanaged these circumstances and need to be assessed as to why they are letting these alleged incidents happen
I agree DD2 the point I am making is the BBC are a high profile business who have had many instances of proven abuse and alleged ones the most recent Strictly and still it happens.
You would think any other company that has these issues would do more to make sure it is minimised as best they can.
It's not tax payers money, it's licence fee payers money. Big difference. You can opt out.It's the BBC that is toxic time and time again and still they do not learn.
Ah well it's only tax payers money
They still hound you if you try and opt out. The BBC should be a subscription service, like Netflix. It's an absolute joke people are forced to pay the fee. Paying the wages of big trunks Nolan and other clowns.It's not tax payers money, it's licence fee payers money. Big difference. You can opt out.
Forced?! I know loads of people who don't pay it. You just stop paying! I have a pal who pays it for a while from time to time to watch stuff on iplayer.They still hound you if you try and opt out. The BBC should be a subscription service, like Netflix. It's an absolute joke people are forced to pay the fee. Paying the wages of big trunks Nolan and other clowns.
They bombard you with threats in the mail. Scare tacticsForced?! I know loads of people who don't pay it. You just stop paying! I have a pal who pays it for a while from time to time to watch stuff on iplayer.
Tip of the Iceberg was to be expected from a Green Grocer.At first I thought this was an over reaction to poor jokes and borderline innuendo, not saying that is ok btw just that it might have not been the issue the media whipped up.
Then the sock story and others like the spill on his trousers, this may be all or may be tip of the iceberg but either way in any other job that is gross misconduct ( unless you are an adult entertainer lol).
i was neither a fan nor a hater, but you can't act like this in the workplace no mater who you are
Whatever happened to innocent until proved guilty.The BBC have pulled the 3 Masterchef Christmas Specials.
Unfortunately that doesn't happen when you live in the spot light. Trial by social media, your a city fan. Mendy lost his career because he was accused of rape. He was proven innocent in a court of law. Now he is claiming loss of earnings against city.Whatever happened to innocent until proved guilty.
None of this is going to court. So it's hardly relevant.Whatever happened to innocent until proved guilty.
Enter your email address to join: