Also, the 12 years into the EU is guesswork and speculation, and is utterly irrelevant to what I have asked you previously and the topic at hand.
And as far as I'm aware there would be no impediment to joining the single market immediately.
Also, the 12 years into the EU is guesswork and speculation, and is utterly irrelevant to what I have asked you previously and the topic at hand.
People being unable to seperate the opinion and speculation from the base question on this topic is depressing. Or it's deliberate, which is both worrying and depressing.And as far as I'm aware there would be no impediment to joining the single market immediately.
Warm beer, in a pewter, mug, wearing a flat cap, at a table near the fire at the Local, while listening to Noddy Holder regaling us with his favourite Christmas Carol, dog under the table, and lubricating the old vocal cordage in anticipation of a jolly old sing along to "My Old Man Said Foller the Baand" belted out on the old joanna later Ron, chips and a packet of woodbines on the way home, and a crafty pee against the newsagent's front door.He's a GB fetishist. Get misty-eyed over warm beer and all things British.
Why not allow the areas Scotland that want independence to secede while the others stay in the Union?People being unable to seperate the opinion and speculation from the base question on this topic is depressing. Or it's deliberate, which is both worrying and depressing.
Like most, I have my issues with the SNP. They are, if anything, growing year on year, but Nicola Sturgeon is doing a very good, slow methodical job of exposing the willingness of Westmisnter and their compliant media to deny the will of the Scottish people. Its not going fast enough for some, but if you take this thread as a cross section, the outright refusal of people to answer the question "when would you grant a referendum" is making a lot of people look very, very stupid.
The opportunities to then expose them as utter hypocrites, liars, and deniers of democracy come almost too thick and fast to catch them all. You are seeing the entire play book of bad faith debating being vomited out in real time, on a population level
What would be the precedence for that? Why would anyone even argue such a thing unless trying to deliberately continue muddying the waters?Why not allow the areas Scotland that want independence to secede while the others stay in the Union?
Why not allow the areas Scotland that want independence to secede while the others stay in the Union?
It seems democratically fair to allow regions that prefer to tay in the Union to do so.Scotland is a country with defined borders. If you're arguing for federalism, that's fair enough, as that's a different argument.
It seems democratically fair to allow regions that prefer to tay in the Union to do so.
But not countries within the UK to remain in the EU, apparentlyIt seems democratically fair to allow regions that prefer to tay in the Union to do so.
The trouble with the EU is that it isn't a country but a mish-mash of treaties, with not one country on equal status.But not countries within the UK to remain in the EU, apparently
Correct. Scotland could only have entered into a union of nations by virtue of being a nation itself.Where do you draw the line? Scotland is a recognised country. If a region wished to secede from a country, I'm sure there would be a process for that, but it's not really what is being discussed here.
What's that got to do with democratic fairness?But not countries within the UK to remain in the EU, apparently
BritainCorrect. Scotland could only have entered into a union of nations by virtue of being a nation itself.
Once again, the concept that lots of people seem to be Implying but aren't prepared to say, is that Scotland has been absorbed into England,
Britain
I totally agree with the right to choose. And that a once only choice doesn't suit democracy as demographics change over time. As Brexit has shown some choices take so damn long to implement that there should be a reasonable period of time before revisiting a decision. We can't flip flop in and out of the EU. And doing the hokey cokey with independence isn't a good idea either. If I get a chance to abolish the Welsh assembly I'll vote for that. And if I'm on the losing side can we make it best of 3.So the best of my knowledge, we still haven't had an explanation from anyone as to why Scotland shouldn't be allowed to vote on withdrawal from a "Union of Consent" beyond "but they already had a vote". This point is obviously easy to dismantle, given that we voted to join the EU, yet a vote came in which we left, and also that we have General Elections every few years with ability to change your mind being a cornerstone of democracy.
We also haven't had an answer to "under what circumstances should a vote be allowed" other than some suggestions that an arbitrarily arrived at amount to of time should be allowed to pass, most frequently mentioned as a the completely subjective "generation".
Is this really the best we can do when arguing to deny the mandate of a repeatedly elected govt/majority of Scottish MPs to UK government??
Please.... Someone restore my faith in the UK population to be able to actually think and reason.....
Under what circumstances should the people of Scotland be granted a referendum on Independence?
Guys calm down have a beer relax, if Scotland wants to be free i am sure they will tell us, now grab a beer and seriously think about this in a clear defined logical way, do you really think the powers that be really care about what is said on here no nor do i, now you are all calm and peaceful do you think life is short with so much to do yes so do i, have you ever stopped to think about why you are not in politics go on sit down and really think about it try and come to a rational answer, is it because some of things you do would hurt some people more than others or you could not live with some of the disissoins you had to make or they make you uncomfortable, think about long and hard
Rod's on the moonshineChrist! What time did you start today?