The only answer to this conflict is, Ukraine and the west must grind him down until his own people turn on him, all the while keeping in mind is he crazy enough to push the button i don't think he is
I agree we have to push Russia back as our livelihood depends on this. However, this one is much more serious than Brexit and we cannot afford mistakes if we want to exist.Russia wanting a buffer zone is an understatement...it's essential for the defence of Russia and for them to have a good defence of their own territory from ground attack/invasion and access to strategic ports to project their Naval power. Russia is still living with a mindset that they must be strong and powerful and that Russia somehow is entitled to have a huge empire at its disposal and the decline of Russia over the last 100 years or so, maybe longer, is a problem for Russians. So Putin is still trying to reclaim the glory days of the Empire.
And of course appeasement never works...been tried many times through history and has failed every time with disastrous consequences...so though it is true that the expansion of the EU and NATO is the cause of Putins actions, that is not to say it is NATO or the EU's fault..in the same way that the way Germany was treated after WW1 led to the rise of the Nazi's and Hitler, but you cant really say it is their fault - the fault lies totally with the Nazi's and Hitler.
There is another angle to this meaning it is essential we send a message that tin pot dictators like Putin cannot be seen to be getting away with their actions and being rewarded in any way...that is that other tin pot dictators, and one non-tin pot dictator in particular, are watching and seeing this as a test of the international communities response to such actions. In particular China will be watching and taking notes as it ponders its own invasion of Taiwan and its ever increasing attempts to take control of other territories. If we dont stand upto Putin then the chances of China escalating their own boarder disputes is low, but if we are passive in our response then that will encourage China to be more proactive. So a huge part of this is posturing.
You are correct and further highlights the failures of the UN to stop conflict and sufferingIf this chat is just about NATO, what are they doing to protect the people in Palestine. What about Syria, Yemen, why stop at Ukraine. Why not discuss all the current wars. Never mind talking about the past wars that have been a disaster. Over 1 million dead in Iraq, Afghanistan was another disaster..
Unfortunately We are hell bent and seem to be hard wired to destroy each other.
Erm....the UN has been a big supporter of Hamas and has facilitated, aided and abetted Hamas in its persecution of the Palestinian people...The UN is a tool of Hamas in that particular conflict. It's part of the problem and should be nowhere near the solution. And why would NATO be involved in the conflict in Palestine...It's the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. Its role is to prevent nuclear war with Russia.If this chat is just about NATO, what are they doing to protect the people in Palestine. What about Syria, Yemen, why stop at Ukraine. Why not discuss all the current wars. Never mind talking about the past wars that have been a disaster. Over 1 million dead in Iraq, Afghanistan was another disaster..
Unfortunately We are hell bent and seem to be hard wired to destroy each other.
Zelenski is running out of people... I find it strange that he cannot recruit people (mercenaries) from abroad, perhaps he should raise the wage. However, I would think Putin will do something else like providing a submarine to houthis with torpedoes or missiles that forced "Dwight Eisenhower" from Red SeaThe only answer to this conflict is, Ukraine and the west must grind him down until his own people turn on him, all the while keeping in mind is he crazy enough to push the button i don't think he is
If this chat is just about NATO, what are they doing to protect the people in Palestine. What about Syria, Yemen, why stop at Ukraine. Why not discuss all the current wars. Never mind talking about the past wars that have been a disaster. Over 1 million dead in Iraq, Afghanistan was another disaster..
Unfortunately We are hell bent and seem to be hard wired to destroy each other.
I see it differently - only negotiations worked with Putin. For example, Russia is in military alliance with Armenia. However, Azeri president had very long productive negotiations with Putin and came to an agreement that Russian military did not get into the conflict in Nagornyj Karabakh.Negotiations only work when backed up with the ultimate threat, so however you decide to solve big international problems you need a strong posturing of force to back you up and show you mean business in case things do get nasty, especially when you're dealing with tin pot dictators like Putin...ultimately he will only respect someone if they are wielding a bigger stick than he.
As for Russia's nuclear capability...while I wouldn't want to take this gamble, I suspect it no longer has one. Given the decrepit state of the Russian military and the poor state of its equipment I'd not be surprised if all the nukes Russia has are duds. They need alot of maintenance, they're not weapons you can just put on the shelf of years and then suddenly pull off the shelf, blow off the dust and deploy. And even if the warheads are good, the ability of them to be able to deploy them will be much depleted...they don't have the planes, don't have the subs and god knows how reliable their ICBMs would be. But having said that it only needs one to get through.
I like to keep neutrality, so now I will jump into another side saying Russia is weak :)Again i do not wish to breach security protocols here but if you think that Russia does not have the ability to launch a nuclear warhead then i would respectfully suggest you are mistaken.
Russia have a large stockpile and once the treaty expires you will see a large increase in NEW nuclear weapons.
Again keeping this very high level but the design of reactors used in the former Soviet Union are dual purpose, not just to generate power, do the sums look how many reactors they have and calculate how much erm product that will produce (deliberately avoiding certain terminology)
Cast your mind back to the last 2 Russian Space launches, the US warned this could be delivering nuclear weapons to space installations now IF this was the case given the lack of propulsion needed to deliver from space this means anywhere in the globe is within reach.
The Russian naval fleet is vast and not fully accounted for, but they are a genuine and credible threat i can assure you we do not spend time and money to monitor this for nothing! We have 4 boats only one at sea at anytime that is common fact, again not wanting to breach security protocols. Russia are currently constructing new subs as we speak , so they are clearly committed to supporting this delivery method as submarines are extremely effective and almost impossible to detect until they launched. This is not old tech sitting on the shelf, this is brand new equipment still coming into service.
Also Russia would not likely nuke the UK directly they have teased the underwater nuclear device that can create and massive tsunami, this would damage out ability to respond and doubt we would ever see it coming.
Not trying to create fear but do not underestimate Russia's ability to launch a war head tho i doubt they would as they know its a one way ticket, also no one has ever actually seen what the current generation of nuclear warheads actually do, they have been simulated, but never a full scale test of the current generation in anger
Do you know that there is not enough bunkers for all of us in the UK? And, even though the first Russian nuclear strike is likely to be limited, meaning that most of the population won't be hit immediately, we will have lots of polluted territories.
Interesting video about the state of all current tanks
I thought A10 are due to be decommissioned, why not give them away?It will never happen but if the US gifted a squadron of A10 Thunderbolts to Ukraine they could reek havoc as to be blunt use a cold war tank buster to bust cold war soviet tanks would be devastating, despite being an old design ground troops love them as they operate close to ground and chew up everything in their path, for this environment they could be nigh on perfect but its one toy the US will not share.
Enter your email address to join: