simon12
Landlord.
Thats looks about right to me. I think the tier system is flawed (partly demonstrated by this) in there are not that much differences between them. The main difference if where the rule of 6 applies or if it does and I don't believe many people follow it to the letter and instead use there own judgement of who they see or don't. The next difference seems to be purely targeted at pubs and restaurants which opened then for 8 weeks cases carried on falling, while nothing that opened and cases then increased is closed in any tier. They should have additional tiers even if they didn't plan to put anywhere in them immediately, my suggestion would be tier 4 closes gyms, tattooists, hairdressers and other things that involve close contact, tier 5 that and schools and non essential retail also close. A tier 0 where only mass gatherings are band and social distancing is advised would be nice to see a light at the end.Brauner et al looked at what interventions had an effect - in short reducing the size of gatherings had the most effect in cutting R, followed by closing down education and face-to-face businesses, whereas forcing people to stay at home beyond that didn't have much impact.
View attachment 37557
I also think if education is so important to stay open it should have been the 1st thing to reopen when cases should have only spread between students and there households while everyone else was still in the 1st lockdown.