I love a good 'meaty' type of debate, and here are the findings of the V1 jury
First, I see there as being some confusion over what's being said
Been reading lots of posts where brewers are using a bubbler/airlock to ferment their brews, why?
During the primary fermentation so much co2 gas is given off and it being heavier than air provides a superb barrier to airbourne infections.
Only after this initial fermentation does the level go down which calls for an airlock to be used and then only after the initial racking.
If anyone is doubtful, lift the lid during the fermatation and take a good whiff, when you get off the floor you'll know what I mean. (joking of course, be careful).
You haven't actually said how you ferment TC :hmm:
Know this might sound contentious but it helps for everyone to know good brewing practises and how to produce good sound beers
I'll come back to this as it's directly related to the next two comments, which are
My point is why suggest we should brew under airlock when there is no real need for it.
Airlocks can give as many problems aa they solve, especially when people add unsterilised water into them and it bubbles back.
Good brewing practise is that wherever possible, the ingress of contaminents/spoiling organisms should be avoided/minimised.
I dont say airlocks are not good, just not neccesary, how many time have people gone to look at their beer, (to see how it's going), and ended up inducing aitlock water into their brew as the pressure changed when lifting lid.
I don't think it's fair to criticise a sound system based on human error.
but attention to detail makes the diifference between a good beer and a great beer
Agreed, but if your not capable of lifting the lid of a airlocked beer without inducing the airlock contents into the fv you have bigger problems at hand.
Brewers are being induced into fitting airlocks by the pre-drilled holes
Good point, but the brewer has a choice as to whether to buy that item or not, as you've pointed out.
Back to good brewing practice. Quoting old methods of fermentation is not sound reason as to why we should maintain said practices. Yorkshire squares were predominantly used for the fermentation of ales that were to be consumed quite quickly, and spoiling organisms were not given much chance to get a hold of the beer, within reason.
Fermenting under airlock is a superior method to just cracking the lid slightly open on your fv. If the airlock is maintained with a sterile solution there is no good reason for contaminent ingress, other than by human error which is not a reflection on the 'system'.
There is no measure of opening when cracking a lid partially open, so it is possible that motile organisms could 'infect' the beer.
Personally I've used both systems without problem. I have fallen foul of dragging the airlock contents back into the fv, but luckily for me, I had maintained the airlock properly, so it wasn't a problem.
The suggestion that retailers may be only supplying fv's with drilled lids is simply not true.
At the end of the day it's easier and cheaper, to just crack the lid open slightly, as opposed to the expense of using an airlock...but that should never be confused with 'best practice'.