GhostShip
Junior Member
But if he was placid and cooperative, then by taking him in you achieve all the things you point out, without arresting him. So, why did they HAVE to arrest him?
Just a quick request - can you stop putting words into my mouth, please, I have at no point suggested that the police should have done nothing, and said “Oh,that’s OK then, we’ll be off” or that 'the Police stopped arresting people where a killing had taken place'. I'm simply trying to ascertain if the was a legal reason that the police needed to arrest and detain him f he was being placid and cooperative.
Sorry if you felt I was putting words into your mouth - that was certainly not my intention.
It's all about opinions and that's what forums are for. I feel this whole situation has been well handled by the Police and CPS, but accept that others may see it differently.