- Joined
- Aug 12, 2015
- Messages
- 10,732
- Reaction score
- 10,668
I think Musk should ban him from Twitter. Problem solved.
He's too busy sorting out the capitol hill riotI think Musk should ban him from Twitter. Problem solved.
Motd viewing figures not really the issue, tbh.Half a million people watched MoTD last night. Good result for BBC. Extend the highlights and get rid of the pundits
I think most of the fuss is that the director of the BBC is a major tory donor disciplines on his channels main stars when they criticise tory policy's.I don't understand what all the fuss is about, a bloke does a tweet about something he personally doesn't agree with which is his right, and it turns into a massive row, wow haven't we come along way since we walked out of the cave, i have have never tweeted wtf is tweeting how sad have we become and i would bet the guy in question knew what sh-t storm would follow, looks like he has gone from being a very good footballer to a good presenter and now trying his hand at influencing people another group i have no time for, if i was a gambler i would put money on Micha Richards being the next lead on mot
No - it doubles the problem, as the real problem is arbitrary censorship of one side of a debate and not the other. Maybe you're in favour of that but I'm not - if this was the other way round there would be cries of "woke snowflakes" engaging in "cancel culture". People just need to be a bit more tolerant of other people.I think Musk should ban him from Twitter. Problem solved.
Just because there's some curiosity about how a one-off show worked doesn't mean it's the best format long-term. Sports TV is a brutally competitive market - if no-pundits highlights was a format that worked then TV channels around the world would be using it. You should trust the market....Half a million people watched MoTD last night. Good result for BBC. Extend the highlights and get rid of the pundits
It doesn't so much "put it into question" as "demonstrates unequivocally that it doesn't exist"The fact that the Director of the BBC donated £400,000 to the Conservative party, puts the BBCs impartiality in question, would also be an issue
Exactly.Motd viewing figures not really the issue, tbh.
The tories cruel and unworkable policy towards asylum seekers is the main issue.
The fact that the Director of the BBC donated £400,000 to the Conservative party, puts the BBCs impartiality in question, would also be an issue
The only main public figure in the UK that spoke out against this policy is a football pundit is a sad reflection on British politics at the moment.
The majority of 5 live listeners are saying it's not the same without them and they want them back, do you think the BBC will see the viewing figures as a good thing and get rid of Linaker, Shearer and the rest altogether I think not, they will be back in their seats next weekend.Half a million people watched MoTD last night. Good result for BBC. Extend the highlights and get rid of the pundits
If so then it would appear that they haven't been consistent in their application of the rules.There's a couple of pictures doing the rounds of the beeb replying to complaints about tweets from Chris Packham and Andrew Neil, both excused by the fact that there twitter accounts were their own views.
If so then it would appear that they haven't been consistent in their application of the rules.
When you are taking large sums of money from the bbc you really should be more careful how you word your social media posts.
Some people seem to think they can say and do what they want with NO reprecussions.
The chap who called a police horse GAY was going to have the book thrown at him, until the police realised the ridicule they'd be subject too.
300k more watched MOTD to see Lineker in his pants after Leciester won the league. Did you call for that to become a regular thing?Half a million people watched MoTD last night. Good result for BBC. Extend the highlights and get rid of the pundits
... or how your arrange loans for friends... Or which political parties you donate hundreds of thousands of pounds to.When you are taking large sums of money from the bbc you really should be more careful how you word your social media posts
The question has been asked several times would there have been such an uproar it Linaker had tweeted that the policy was good?When you are taking large sums of money from the bbc you really should be more careful how you word your social media posts.
Alan Sugar has said much worse and there was no comeback for him either, double standards from the BBCIndeed.
I would tend to agree if he was employed by the bbc and was slagging off the corporation, however as said before in the thread he is freelance and I think is entitled to air his opinions via his own twitter account .On previous form the BBC seem to think so too vis-a-vis Andrew Neil & Packham.
Alan Sugar has said much worse and there was no comeback for him either, double standards from the BBC
Enter your email address to join: