Cononthebarber
Landlord.
This may be a silly question but is there a good reason we don't use normal household cleaner such as dettol to sterilise and clean equipment? It does kill 99.9% of bacteria afterall...
cask is best said:I use a steam bullet. 20 seconds of hot steam in the bottles and they get that hot you have to hold them with oven gloves. Been using it a year now cost 40 sheets. Now you tell me any nasties can survive that Had no ill effects yet.
I agree. I give my bottles a good rinse out with hot water and theyâre always fine. I said this some months ago on here and got severely chastised by one of the mods for misleading people!winelight said:I'm sure people are bored with me repeating this, but someone (I forget who) on this forum said his dad only bothers to sanitise his bottles once a year - so they get used half-a-dozen times between sanitisation - and has never had an infection in donkey's years.
Well, I put this to the test and bottled a batch of Coopers stout without sanitisation, and every bottle was absolutely fine.
Of course the bottles were well washed first.
crE said:It's better safe than sorry though I guess.
How about an infection from someone who has sanitised bottles and still got an infection in the bottle!!winelight said:crE said:It's better safe than sorry though I guess.
This is the bottom line - we don't want to mislead people into getting infected brews.
But when it comes to bottles, that's different. Firstly, I've never heard of an infection from people who haven't sanitised bottles. Secondly, if there is a problem, it should only affect one bottle.
Aleman said:or perhaps even more worryingly (but more likely) . .The brewer didn't realise that the beer was infected
Aleman said:Trust me if you have sampled some of the beers that we had at the National Comp (2012) and Sutton on occasion, you would be more tempted to actually make sure that you did a proper job. Of course that actually implies that either these beers were entered in the full knowledge that there was a problem . . .or perhaps even more worryingly (but more likely) . .The brewer didn't realise that the beer was infected . . .and was quite happy drinking infected beer.
So you're saying of the 40 bottles of stout I will be bottling this weekend - 13 will likely be infected? :wha: :nah:zgoda said:Aleman said:Trust me if you have sampled some of the beers that we had at the National Comp (2012) and Sutton on occasion, you would be more tempted to actually make sure that you did a proper job. Of course that actually implies that either these beers were entered in the full knowledge that there was a problem . . .or perhaps even more worryingly (but more likely) . .The brewer didn't realise that the beer was infected . . .and was quite happy drinking infected beer.
Yes, we had the same here. Of 3 bottles sent to our Regional it was common 1 to be infected. This time the reserve one was used for tastings, but I guess this will not be the case in 2014.
crE said:So you're saying of the 40 bottles of stout I will be bottling this weekend - 13 will likely be infected? :wha: :nah:zgoda said:Aleman said:Trust me if you have sampled some of the beers that we had at the National Comp (2012) and Sutton on occasion, you would be more tempted to actually make sure that you did a proper job. Of course that actually implies that either these beers were entered in the full knowledge that there was a problem . . .or perhaps even more worryingly (but more likely) . .The brewer didn't realise that the beer was infected . . .and was quite happy drinking infected beer.
Yes, we had the same here. Of 3 bottles sent to our Regional it was common 1 to be infected. This time the reserve one was used for tastings, but I guess this will not be the case in 2014.
Aleman said:if you choose not to that is up to you . . . just don't expect more experienced brewers to sit there and say nothing about your shoddy, slap dash methods
Enter your email address to join: