Really ? Why have you never mentioned this before :-)
Kits -> all grain -> extract -> all grain/extract for me.
I did a few extracts after doing AG as I didn't want to miss anything out.
AG gives the best flavours etc. it's only down side is time - 1 hour mash, 1 hour boil plus all the heating up and cooling down. I've made an experimental batch which had a half hour boil which I'm waiting to taste. I'm also going to do a half hour mash, my suspicion is it will only reduce the efficiency which I can compensate for by using more grain. If they both work then that's an hour saved ( big if). The up side of the time part is it is only loosely linked to volume. So if you have the kit you might as well go big :-)
I've been cutting my mash down to 40-45 mins. I did a 45 min boil last time to as an experimental. Clarity seems good. But cutting the mash time down is fine, a reduced boil time is more disputed.
I started with a few 1g all grain kits that I was bought and, even tho I didn't have a clue what I was doing, produced some good beer. I then switched to kits for about 6 months while I tried to master fermentation etc before going back to ag. Kits are great for doing a half decent brew But the results aren't a patch on ag. I can't really comment on extract but the one I've tried (brewed by @dad_of_john) was really good so I'd definitely try one if I'm ever short of time.
I've seen that, I've just comprised. Ten minutes won't always produce a decent efficiency, I reckon.
Much better beer. Ready to drink quickly. And brew anything you like. As hoppy as you like. Choose your yeast. Choose your malts and hops.
Not much equipment needed. A pot and a bag.
Save money.
Clean up isn't a big deal.
More satisfaction.
Much better beer. Ready to drink quickly. And brew anything you like. As hoppy as you like. Choose your yeast. Choose your malts and hops.
Not much equipment needed. A pot and a bag.
Save money.
Clean up isn't a big deal.
More satisfaction.
C'mon now darth :smile:
You can choose your own hops and yeast with extract. Granted you have much bigger variety of malts to choose.
So, if I understand correctly, AG gives a cost saving but requires a bit of capital investment, takes longer, is messier with a bigger clean up and spent grain to dispose of at the end. Additionally the steam/condensation in the kitchen and smell is likely to bring conflict into the marital bliss I currently enjoy. What exactly are the benefits in terms of beer quality?
About the same as the difference between a frozen, microwave 'Sunday roast' dinner and the real deal i.e rolling your sleeves up, peeling the potatoes, sticking a roast in the oven and saying, "to hell with steamy windows..."
Another analogy I read was it's like comparing diluting orange with freshly squeezed orange juice. If you're happy with a quick fix of diluting orange, so be it. Robinsons do a great 'contains real fruit' blend... but it ain't in a million years a patch on real fresh orange. :drink:
About the same as the difference between a frozen, microwave 'Sunday roast' dinner and the real deal i.e rolling your sleeves up, peeling the potatoes, sticking a roast in the oven and saying, "to hell with steamy windows..."
Enter your email address to join: