So just to share a few extra comments for anyone who might be reading this thread and considering a bash at the stove-top BIAB.
Equipment used:
- 20l SS pan (30cm diameter) for heating water and boiling
- A Young's FV with the big srew-top lid which I used to mash in
- A very large plastic bucket from B&Q that I could use as an ice bath
- A large mesh bag
- A big, long wooden paddle (Sharing a link as the one I have is a pretty useful size - you can get a 3-pack for about £7: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B003VRYQUE/?tag=skimlinks_replacement-20)
Method:
On timings, it took about 5 hours all-in, which for a 60 min mash and 70 min boil is bad maths! Probably took an extra 45 mins to heat the initial water to 70*C, another 15 min to mash in, 30 mins of lautering, 15 mins of sparging and then another 45 mins to get to a rolling boil, followed by 30 mins of chilling. All adds up.
Would I do it again? Yes and no.
Yes in that this has all felt so much more satisfactory compared to making a kit. Of course the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and so it remains to see what the final beer turns out like, but I know I got a decent extraction rate (I calculated 64% efficiency, making some estimates for the volume of pre-boil wort). So it's now down to getting a decent ferment and hoping that the messy wort doesn't impact things. I know there'll be a lot more satisfaction in drinking this beer, assuming it's not a dud.
No in that I can pay my way out of these annoying things and just buy an all-in-one system. Would be interested to hear if lautering and heating times are improved... ?
With the 'cleaner wort' point, I understand that some people will transfer everything to the FV, trub and all, so this is just a matter of preference. Also, with the GF coming with a counterflow chiller, I'm assuming the cold break happens in the chiller, so naturally all the trub gets transferred, save for a little bit of hop particle that might get filtered out. Is that correct?
Overall, I would say give this a go if you're not able to get an all-in-one solution. But similarly, with the benefit of hindsight, I don't think that this was a necessary learning experience or stepping stone to moving to all-in-one - I'd say that if budget is not an issue and you were pretty set on investing in the shiny stuff, just do it straight away. Big takeaway is that brewing beer from grain is not difficult at all. BIAB is just a slightly faffier way of doing it.
Equipment used:
- 20l SS pan (30cm diameter) for heating water and boiling
- A Young's FV with the big srew-top lid which I used to mash in
- A very large plastic bucket from B&Q that I could use as an ice bath
- A large mesh bag
- A big, long wooden paddle (Sharing a link as the one I have is a pretty useful size - you can get a 3-pack for about £7: https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B003VRYQUE/?tag=skimlinks_replacement-20)
Method:
- Heated about 18l of water to 70*C in the big pan. Used the mesh bag to line the Young's FV and put about half the grain in the bag.
- Poured about half of the water into the FV and mixed everything up a bit. Didn't experience much in the way of clumping at this stage.
- Added rest of grain and water in increments, mixing things thoroughly along the way. The long, non-flexible spoon was a must for this as it was helpful to get right to the bottom of the grain to knock any clumps out. Being in a bag was a bit annoying as it gets in the way a bit. Could see this being a bit easier in a Grainfather or similar all-in-one.
- Wrapped in a sleeping bag and left things be for an hour.
- Lautering was a bit of a pain for two reasons. Firstly, although it was only 3.75kg of grain, holding the bag whilst all the water dribbles out was a pain. This is one place where I can see a Grainfather being a massive help by just lifing the grain basket out and leaving it to drain out. The second issue was that the grain has swelled and compacted and was now wider than the neck of the FV. If I was to do this again, I'd do it in a normal clip-lid FV. The floor got quite sticky. I was also amazed at how much water volume was lost to the grain.
- Just before the end of the mash, I'd heated another 6l of water in the big pan. I 'dunk sparged' by just putting the grain bag into the heated water, moving around a bit and leaving for 10 mins or so. I took a hydrometer reading of this wort and you could see just how much sugar was left. The bit I hadn't planned ahead for was what to do with the spent grain afterwards - chucked that in another bucket and managed to cram it into the food waste bin, but bigger grain bills might be a pain to dispose of.
- Combined the two worts in the big pan and got on with boiling. Took aaaaages to get up to the boil on the stove but got there eventually. Then added the hops and protofloc as required by the recipe. Things got a bit frothy just before the rolling boil, so gently stirred the head back in and didn't get any boil overs.
- Chilled in an ice bath, having covered the pan with clingfilm. It was a bit cold yesterday so put the whole setup outside to help chill down. Realised I'd forgotten to add the hops at flameout so quickly added them when the wort was at about 50*C - not sure what effect that will have! Had to replace the water once the wort was down to about 35*C as it was too warm. Cold tap water in the 'ice bath' was enough to bring wort temp down to 22*C. Didn't take that long actually, although the bucket was big and I did have a lot of ice to hand.
- Transferred to the FV using a syphon as I thought I'd be able to keep a lot of the trub behind. I was mistaken - the FV is full of muck and hop powder. Not sure if that was correct or with a bit more protofloc and a better chiller, you would expect to keep more crap behind. There was still some gunk left in the pan, along with a bit of wort.
- I gave up on the target SG of 1.050 and just topped up the FV to get a better volume without any real science. Got 1.044 which should give a nice 4.5% ale at the end.
- Pitched rehydrated yeast and put in the brew fridge at 17*C. Wort was 20*C when I pitched.
On timings, it took about 5 hours all-in, which for a 60 min mash and 70 min boil is bad maths! Probably took an extra 45 mins to heat the initial water to 70*C, another 15 min to mash in, 30 mins of lautering, 15 mins of sparging and then another 45 mins to get to a rolling boil, followed by 30 mins of chilling. All adds up.
Would I do it again? Yes and no.
Yes in that this has all felt so much more satisfactory compared to making a kit. Of course the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and so it remains to see what the final beer turns out like, but I know I got a decent extraction rate (I calculated 64% efficiency, making some estimates for the volume of pre-boil wort). So it's now down to getting a decent ferment and hoping that the messy wort doesn't impact things. I know there'll be a lot more satisfaction in drinking this beer, assuming it's not a dud.
No in that I can pay my way out of these annoying things and just buy an all-in-one system. Would be interested to hear if lautering and heating times are improved... ?
With the 'cleaner wort' point, I understand that some people will transfer everything to the FV, trub and all, so this is just a matter of preference. Also, with the GF coming with a counterflow chiller, I'm assuming the cold break happens in the chiller, so naturally all the trub gets transferred, save for a little bit of hop particle that might get filtered out. Is that correct?
Overall, I would say give this a go if you're not able to get an all-in-one solution. But similarly, with the benefit of hindsight, I don't think that this was a necessary learning experience or stepping stone to moving to all-in-one - I'd say that if budget is not an issue and you were pretty set on investing in the shiny stuff, just do it straight away. Big takeaway is that brewing beer from grain is not difficult at all. BIAB is just a slightly faffier way of doing it.
Last edited by a moderator: