simon12
Landlord.
We do seem to be all in for a vaccine ignoring anything that could be used as a preventative or treatment.
We do seem to be all in for a vaccine ignoring anything that could be used as a preventative or treatment.
If I heard this right yesterday we will have to get used to this being amongst us (like the flu) the difference being it won't kill anywhere near as many people as it does now.
I was under the impression this is going to the same as the flu no cure but an annual vaccine to keep the majority safe.
I was under the impression this is going to the same as the flu no cure but an annual vaccine to keep the majority safe.
Won't the wider scope of the vaccine mean the virus is more likely to die out than flu though? I only started having flu jabs a few years ago when they were offered free through work, I'd hazard a guess that's the same for most people with only a relatively small percentage of the population covered. If there's more widespread coverage (50-60%?) isn't it more likely to die out as the R number falls?It's still early days, but it seems likely that the vaccines are good enough that we won't need annual jabs. Maybe a booster every 5-10 years like tetanus or something, maybe it will be good enough for life, we don't know yet.
But viruses are tough for drugs, you generally have cheap pills that don't really work, or fancy injections that are very expensive and sort-of work to improve symptoms for serious cases. AIUI the idea of the Boots pills is that they coat your nose in a film that makes it harder for nasties to get in, they're not "killing" the virus as such.
Don't admin of essential forums get priority!
Enter your email address to join: