Contactless charging.
You still have the problem of having to get the car over the pad.
Contactless charging.
When I look at the existing traffic on the roads,I do think where is all this electric to come from.
Have parking spaces with pads in the tarmac, a scanner to record credit card detailsYou still have the problem of having to get the car over the pad.
Have parking spaces with pads in the tarmac, a scanner to record credit card details
50% that is high. Not much terrace housing where I live but ones I see tend to have rear garage, space to park.I am not sure if we have our wires crossed (no pun intended)
The problem for me and i think the stats say 50% of the driving population is we don't have off street parking and cannot guarantee we can park outside our homes meaning we cannot charge using the cables provided with the car, to use wireless charging would mean every house would need a pad in the road outside, is this what you are suggesting?
I didn't mean parking outside your house. The pads will be for anyone to use with a panel on the road to scan your payment card.
They won't have an option in the future, but no doubt current charging options will be outdatedI did think that is what you meant but wanted to check.
That is going to put people who have no option other than to use street charging points off buying an EV as they are going to have to pay a premium to charge it and i believe there isn't much of a saving when you compare running an EV on street charging points only with a small engine turbo petrol car and with the car you don't have range anxiety and the worry the charging point is broken or in use when you get to it.
Why are they blocking off the pavement rather than the road?I have a feeling our streets will start to look like this over the next few years the down side is those that cannot plug in at home will pay the most which isn't fair.
View attachment 58117
Why are they blocking off the pavement rather than the road?
Yes, but it's always the pedestrian that loses out despite the fact that these additions are for the benefit of the motorist.I wouldn't call it blocking off as long as there is room to get a push chair or wheelchair past, i assume the gap between post and road is for safety reasons lampposts are usually placed the same distance from the carriageway.
View attachment 58459
View attachment 58460
Yes, but it's always the pedestrian that loses out despite the fact that these additions are for the benefit of the motorist.
It's much worse here. However, the motorist seems to gain space by gradual encroachment but screams when cycle lanes take up room on the road even though cyclists free up parking spaces in city centres, a major factor in shortening the travel time for many motorists.I don't know what the set up is like in Italy where you live but in the U.K street lights have always been on the pavement next to the road no one complains because their position on the pavement is not an issue and neither will it be when chargers are placed in the same position, believe me pedestrians don't lose out it really isn't an issue.
Brent and Oxfordshire trialling "doorstep" chargers for people parking at the kerbside outside their house. Not a solution for everybody, but helps another chunk of the population.
Enter your email address to join: