Gulpitdarn
Regular.
How do you prove that the Bible is a Lie?Its all hogwash, some of the greatest lies of life. I had my fill during12 years of boarding school, argued the toss for years with CoE and concluded it is nonsense. Live and let live
How do you prove that the Bible is a Lie?Its all hogwash, some of the greatest lies of life. I had my fill during12 years of boarding school, argued the toss for years with CoE and concluded it is nonsense. Live and let live
How do you prove it’s the truth (maybe I should have chosen “agnostic”)?How do you prove that the Bible is a Lie?
If my memory serves (of the literature, not the actual event) the Samaritans are those who were left behind during the Babylonian exile and they follow the variety of Jewish observance practised in ancient times. Apparently, not all the Israelites left Cana'an for Egypt at the time of the famine and the Samaritans consider themselves decendents not only racially but religiously of the original remainers. Thus the Jews and the Samaritans practised different versions of the same religion and despised each other like the worst Catholic/Protestant tensions. The Jews didn't particularly despise Gentiles- certainly not as much as Samaritans.I thought the Samaritans were Gentiles whom the Jews hated?
(Just put some chocolate malt in a litre, into the fridge ready for a brew tomorrow :thumba:)
Thy Larger Drinkers shalt be saved! :tinhat:
I think you should have included Jews and Muslims. I'd love to know how many Muslim home brewers we've got on the forum.
Is New Age and Pagan the same?
Mainstream Eastern religions like Buddhism and Hinduism are as unalike as chalk and cheese and I don't think the Sikhs would like to lumped in with the other two.
You have a very different take on the good samaritan to me but the point I was making is Jesus apposed the pharisees for there clinging to the parts of Judaism that benifit them and smashed up the temple as it was used to generate money not to please or glorify God. I assumed this was like the 2000 year old version of those you criticise, am I wrong?Er ... I don't think so and I use the parable of "The Good Samaritan" to point this out.
Consider a situation where "The will of God." is seen as being sacrosanct. This system means that anyone who interferes with the status of another person may be acting against "The will of God." It is still prevalent within some religions!
When the man in the ditch was robbed and left for dead by robbers people "passed by on the other side"; and so they might because by going to the man's aid, they could have been accused of going against "The will of God."
It was "The will of God" whether or not the man survived or died in that ditch and by helping him the "Good Samaritan" took onboard ALL of the responsibilities and debts that the man had incurred. i.e. IF the man subsequently died then the "Good Samaritan" had to pay off ALL of his debts and became responsible for ALL of the man's responsibilities.
Think about it. If the man died, the "Good Samaritan" had to look after ANYONE who was dependant on the man. i.e. his wife (or wives), his children, his parents, his grand-parents, his employees, his creditors, etc etc.
Please check out ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_Samaritan_law
... where you will see that the Laws under which most of us live are part of the religion that was being advocated by "Jesus and the Apostles"!
The people I rail against (instead of forgiving them) are those that use religion as a weapon.
One out of four Clint, for question 3.In guessing..
Jehovah
Arabic
30
100
In short no. If you are interested (I assume your not) here is a great video on how we know we have the correct version of the bible it is 1 1/2 hours long and you need to watch it all to really get it.Isn't what's available in the Bible the bits the Romans allowed us to see?