This is my first posting. Generally i 'lurk'!
Here follows a review of my personal thoughts on 24 Belgian beers. Some are bottle-conditioned. Of the 24, only 9 I would buy again. I stored the bottles at the correct temperature and left the beer 10 minutes in the glass to reduce carbonation:
Barbar Bok - disappointing
Bush Beer
Chimay Blue - Gushed, infected
Grimbergen Dubbel - quite good, spicy
Hoegarden Grand Cru -Tastes like a wheat beer, bananary
De Koninck - reasonable spicy flavour
Duvel - reasonable hop character, but uninteresting
Hommelbier
Leffe blonde - a quality, strong Golden
Leffe Bruin - reasonable. A spicy brown beer
Palm - quite malty, lacking character
Maes Pils - low level of taste
Morte Subite Gueze - o.k
St Louis Kriek - nice
Rodenbach Brun - Sour/acidic. A cross between a beer and a wine
Guinness Export (Belgian -no but exported there!) - disappointing
Kwak - rather average. Not good, not bad
Maresdsous 8 - not much flavour
Trappist Rochfort 10 - spicy, dark, treacly, but unworthy
Westmalle Triple- good quality, spicy, prefer it to Duvel
Saison Scotch Silly - interesting caramel malt taste
Alken Maes Hapkin - good hop character
Liefmans Brut - quality cherry ale with a sour finish
Witbier Bruges - wheatbeer. Refreshing, not a lot of character
I was too drunk to comment on the Bush and Hommelbier!
On this limited experience, I would say theres a lot of snobbery about the perceived greatness of Belgian beer. Tim Webb's Good Beer Guide Belgian makes the point that many breweries are producing less good beers than previously due to commercial pressures.
geoff