Hi All,
I have a brew currently on the go, and I'm bumping up against a trust issue.
I have two refractometers and an older hydrometer.
I have confirmed all are reading the same in distilled water. However, they are wildly different in the wort.
The two refractometer are reading 7 Brix (one has an SG scale also) so either converted or off the scale 1.027 SG.
The hydrometer is reading 1.011 SG
The wort has been in the fermentor seven days at an average of 16.5'c (Nottingham yeast).
Starting OG from the refractometer was 1.047 (bang on what the recipe said it would be).
According to the recipe, the FG should be 1.011.
The reason for my concern is I would expect the SG to be much closer to FG by now. Either way, I will leave it in the conical for another seven days.
Things I think might be affecting the reading if I go by the refractometer:
Push comes to shove which would you follow refractometer or hydrometer?
I have a brew currently on the go, and I'm bumping up against a trust issue.
I have two refractometers and an older hydrometer.
I have confirmed all are reading the same in distilled water. However, they are wildly different in the wort.
The two refractometer are reading 7 Brix (one has an SG scale also) so either converted or off the scale 1.027 SG.
The hydrometer is reading 1.011 SG
The wort has been in the fermentor seven days at an average of 16.5'c (Nottingham yeast).
Starting OG from the refractometer was 1.047 (bang on what the recipe said it would be).
According to the recipe, the FG should be 1.011.
The reason for my concern is I would expect the SG to be much closer to FG by now. Either way, I will leave it in the conical for another seven days.
Things I think might be affecting the reading if I go by the refractometer:
- Lower intentional temp of the fermentation
- The older malted barley I used; has been stored in an airtight container for around five months.
Push comes to shove which would you follow refractometer or hydrometer?