This batch is reported to be slightly stronger then . . . replace 183 with 192 method remains the same . . .and I bet it doesn't remove as much as we are told it should :whistle: :whistle: :whistle:danb said:Cheers aleman Murphys AMS tech sheet says 192 reduced with 1ml/l.
AH HA! That explains it! I've been trying to work out where in the UK you were to have a hardness that high. Just a little request to everybody please fill in the Location part of your profile (User Control Panel -> Profile -> Location) even if it is just a general hint of where you are, it makes life easier to guess about local conditionsFore said:I sit between 2 mountain ranges, the Voges & Black Forest
Not necesarily a good thing either as a lot of the modern breweries use deionisation plants to strip everything out of the water to start with then add back what the need so that the water is a known constant They also employ water chemists to make sure that it isThere are lots of local Breweries here though, such as Kronenbourg (1664), so it can't be all bad.
It's been a hard struggle for me over the years to get to grips with it even with a biochemistry degree . . .There is a lot of confusing stuff out there that appears sound but when you get to the nitty, gritty you find it's wrong, or only applicable in a limited set of conditions.My basic understanding of PH and alcalinity was flawed, so some reschooling necessary.
Aleman said:It's been a hard struggle for me over the years to get to grips with it even with a biochemistry degree . . .There is a lot of confusing stuff out there that appears sound but when you get to the nitty, gritty you find it's wrong, or only applicable in a limited set of conditions.
My OP opening paragraph did state my location, but I get the point, I'll update my profile.Aleman said:I've been trying to work out where in the UK you were to have a hardness that high.
Yeah . . . . I didn't get beyond your first sentenceFore said:My OP opening paragraph did state my locationAleman said:I've been trying to work out where in the UK you were to have a hardness that high.
They quote a typical analysis on the bottleNickW said:I contacted asda the other day and they left a voice message on my phone stating that they can't and won't give me a report on their smart price water, and this was because it MAY be bottled at different sources. Bummer :hmm:
Cheers aleman. Nope, I've never seen an analysis on the bottle, not even a pHAleman said:They quote a typical analysis on the bottleNickW said:I contacted asda the other day and they left a voice message on my phone stating that they can't and won't give me a report on their smart price water, and this was because it MAY be bottled at different sources. Bummer :hmm:
While it MAY be bottled at different sources actual analysis over time has showed it to be remarkably stable, and close to the 'typical' profile.
User wallybrew has posted the analysis for smartprice on JBK several times IIRC
That just does not add up, If you consider that the majority of alkalinity is in combination with calcium . . .then what is compensating for the sulphate . . .it isn't the residuals for the calcium together with teh sodium and potassium.gazkilla said:here's what I put in and it seems I just need some Carbonate Reducing Solution
Enter your email address to join: