Bombers hoppy ending
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2021
- Messages
- 176
- Reaction score
- 88
In the interest of information sharing I thought I would pass on my findings to anyone that may be interested.
Wishing to limit the risk of oxidation to as low as possible, and still bottle, I purchased a snub nose and beer gun. In the interest of keeping initial outlay as low as possible, and the fact that we have a sodastream, I elected to go that route for my CO2 supply. The plan was to see how long the small cylinder lasted and evaluate the cost effectiveness.
CO2 was used to aid in cleaning lines prior to brewing, purging the head space after dry hopping and then creating the pressure to transfer to bottles and puff purge the bottles prior to filling. Also a little was used in post fermentation clean up.
I would say I used a little more on the first batch while I played a little with setting up. Including pressure testing the snub nose and setting up the spunding valve.
The second batch definitely used a little less, unfortunately though the gas ran out with 3 bottles left to fill. Luckily I had the ability to pinch the cylinder in the soda stream to finish the bottle day.
Conclusion is this.
1 full new cylinder would probably last 2 batches, just.
Each refill costs £14.99. So that’s £7.50/ 40pint batch. That’s not cost effective. If you add into that the cost of diesel and time to go and get refills it’s a non starter.
Before anyone chimes in that I told you so, yep I would agree I read plenty of posts saying it’s not a viable way to go, but I would also say there are plenty of people that have access to a sodastream cylinder as I did, want to keep the start up costs down and want to know how far one will stretch.
So in the interest of fact base science, I’ve taken one for the team and now anyone that may be thinking of going the same way, will have the knowledge to make an informed decision.
Today I bit the bullet and sorted a contract agreement and collected a 6kg cylinder which should last me around 28 batches. £29.99 compared to £210 is a no brainer.
Hope this is helpful to someone.
Wishing to limit the risk of oxidation to as low as possible, and still bottle, I purchased a snub nose and beer gun. In the interest of keeping initial outlay as low as possible, and the fact that we have a sodastream, I elected to go that route for my CO2 supply. The plan was to see how long the small cylinder lasted and evaluate the cost effectiveness.
CO2 was used to aid in cleaning lines prior to brewing, purging the head space after dry hopping and then creating the pressure to transfer to bottles and puff purge the bottles prior to filling. Also a little was used in post fermentation clean up.
I would say I used a little more on the first batch while I played a little with setting up. Including pressure testing the snub nose and setting up the spunding valve.
The second batch definitely used a little less, unfortunately though the gas ran out with 3 bottles left to fill. Luckily I had the ability to pinch the cylinder in the soda stream to finish the bottle day.
Conclusion is this.
1 full new cylinder would probably last 2 batches, just.
Each refill costs £14.99. So that’s £7.50/ 40pint batch. That’s not cost effective. If you add into that the cost of diesel and time to go and get refills it’s a non starter.
Before anyone chimes in that I told you so, yep I would agree I read plenty of posts saying it’s not a viable way to go, but I would also say there are plenty of people that have access to a sodastream cylinder as I did, want to keep the start up costs down and want to know how far one will stretch.
So in the interest of fact base science, I’ve taken one for the team and now anyone that may be thinking of going the same way, will have the knowledge to make an informed decision.
Today I bit the bullet and sorted a contract agreement and collected a 6kg cylinder which should last me around 28 batches. £29.99 compared to £210 is a no brainer.
Hope this is helpful to someone.