She'll be lucky to survive tomorrow without the 1922 committee initiating a vote of no confidence.I am listening to it on the radio as I type and they are saying the P.M should have resigned, will she?
Nothing to do with the Windrush BTW.
She'll be lucky to survive tomorrow without the 1922 committee initiating a vote of no confidence.I am listening to it on the radio as I type and they are saying the P.M should have resigned, will she?
I reject your reality and instead choose actual reality.Hi!
I disagree; I believe that the majority of Britons do not support a tougher immigration policy.
yep - citing virtue signalling is just a form of signalling in itself. The individual is trying to claim a moral or intellectual superiority by kneecapping someone else's view point, simply by saying the words "virtue signalling". It's brilliant and very clever.
Just in case Bigcol49 thinks that's a nasty biased website, try this instead.I reject your reality and instead choose actual reality.
The Prime Minister has issued a 3 line whip to vote against the opposition's motion to publicise internal communications regarding the Windrush scandal.
Her policy as Home Secretary has led to British citizens losing jobs, denied healthcare, receiving threatening letters, being detained without trial and wrongfully deported. To deny this motion is shameful and an act of cowardice.
She'll get away with it though:
- Amber Rudd has been used as the fall guy
- The Eurosceptics in the Conservative Party are worried that a Europhile will become leader
- The Europhiles in the Conservative Party are worried that a hard-line Eurosceptic (i.e. Jacob Rees-Mogg) will become leader
- Sections of the right wing media (including but not exclusive to the Daily Mail and The Sun) see her as attempting to achieve the hardest Brexit as possible, so will back her to the hilt
- "yeah, yeah but what about Labour/Jeremy Corbyn"
Also I think ID cards for all are the way forward, if you get stopped have no ID card and the immigration computer tells the police you should have left the country then it’s on the plane and home.
"Her policy as Home Secretary has led to British citizens losing jobs, denied healthcare, receiving threatening letters, being detained without trial and wrongfully deported"
Are you sure?
Had they applied for and been granted British citizenship at some time in the last 60 years then you could reasonably call them "British citizens".
If they haven't bothered to apply for citizenship then they're not.
If they're not, any trouble with obtaining healthcare, getting cleared for jobs that require citizenship or applying for re-entry to the country after a trip to the Caribbean (you will note that that implies that they have the wherewithal to maintain citizenship and a passport relating to a foreign country) is their own stupid fault.
You can have a travel document....You know you can have a British passport without having British citizenship right?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you have no ID card how will the computer know you should have left the country [emoji849]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Enter your email address to join: