I've rehydrated in the past but these days just sprinkle on the wort.
As far as I can see there's absolutely no difference in the results.
As far as I can see there's absolutely no difference in the results.
I'm not so sure. Don't some recipes, especially lagers, say pitch 2 packets? They' would sell more items and make more money this way, not less.I am beginning to think that some of these things we have come to believe over the years are created to sell items by manufacturers with no more than anecdotal stories and even some of us brewers convincing ourselves that we have seen improvements in our actions that have not been there.
I watched the video and I just don't buy it. Sure, he claims Lallemand say there's little difference. Do they? He showed us how to rehydrate (without any kind of cover on the flask) and then reiterates that it doesn't make a difference, but where was the comparison? He didn't pitch his starter into a batch of wort and then sprinkle another batch of wort to compare what happens. That's not science.Lallemand has come out and said there is nor discernible difference between rehydrating and not and rehydrating is only a matter of personal process preference
They deffo did do a publicity round about six months before the pandemic saying that. Wish I could find the links, but I'm sure we had a chat about it on hereLallemand say there's little difference. Do they?
I think the yeast book may be a good read especially for liquid yeasts and the like but the thread is regards rehydrating dried yeasts or not and in this case Lallemand has come out and said there is nor discernible difference between rehydrating and not and rehydrating is only a matter of personal process preference
Couldn’t agree more , of course most of the home brew retailers are going to say just sprinkle on the wort it makes no difference , they want to sell as much product as they can , can’t blame them for that, but in my mind and experience it makes a big difference and won’t be changing my method any time soon either. Like I said before it all looks really complicated this rehydration method , but it really ain’t .I'm not so sure. Don't some recipes, especially lagers, say pitch 2 packets? They' would sell more items and make more money this way, not less.
I watched the video and I just don't buy it. Sure, he claims Lallemand say there's little difference. Do they? He showed us how to rehydrate (without any kind of cover on the flask) and then reiterates that it doesn't make a difference, but where was the comparison? He didn't pitch his starter into a batch of wort and then sprinkle another batch of wort to compare what happens. That's not science.
Rehydrating is done at 35C. Do we usually sprinkle a wort with dry yeast with the wort at 35C? What's the significance of 35C?- It's the optimum temperature for rehydration of many ale (not lager) yeasts so sprinkling a batch of wort of 20C is less than optimum.
Sorry. This just isn't science it's bolllocks.
It may possibly be the case that there's not much difference, but this video doesn't demonstrate it.
Manufacturers provide sufficient yeast in a pkt to start a batch of around 5 gallons by sprinkling because not everybody can be bothered or has the sanitary technique to rehydrate.
I'll carry on rehydrating.
The water is boiled first then cooled to 35c and of course sanitation is paramount, when sprinkling straight on to the wort they tell you always pitch at 20c or just below so there’s a massive difference at pitching temperatures and my opinion is it’s shocks the yeast direct pitching does so that’s why some of the cell obviously dieWhat is the specific isue with pitching into a small volume of cooled wort as per the rehydrating instructions on many yeast packets and how does using cooled water differ?
The water is boiled first then cooled to 35c and of course sanitation is paramount, when sprinkling straight on to the wort they tell you always pitch at 20c or just below so there’s a massive difference at pitching temperatures and my opinion is it’s shocks the yeast direct pitching does so that’s why some of the cell obviously die
That's the way I always do it and I learned it from the instructions on a yeast packet, I thought it was the norm?To be honest I have never tried that before in all the years I have been brewing , sounds like a plan and I will do one that way on my next brew, can’t see why not as long as the vessel used for starter is sterilised and ready to go and then covered whilst cooling. Maybe someone on the forum has tried it this way and will comment on good or bad thing to do.
we have chloromine in our water supply that survives a boil.Once the water is boiled not much chance of any chlorine being in it anyway ; and the whole process of rehydration is much easier than it sounds ; have done it for donkeys years with no problem at all and with great results
The theory is that using pure wort will cause a large osmotic pressure between the inside of the yest cells and the liquid outside, which can cause yeast death. The ideal situation would be making up a solution of weak wort at 30-35 C, but water is better than pure wort.Sorry if I didn't make myself clear, I have read and I believe understood the posts so far on this thread, I meant wort from the kettle, if I recall it's 100ml, cooled to 35c, then yeast pitched in. left to settle for 20 mins, stirred once and then pitched to the cooled wort in the FV.
What's the difference with using boiled/cooled tap water and wort to rehydrate please?
never seen it on a yeast packet before, how long have you been doing it that way then mate? I must admit I do like the sound of it and am definitely going for it on my next brewThat's the way I always do it and I learned it from the instructions on a yeast packet, I thought it was the norm?
DON’T SQUEEZE THE BAG :)Well it looks like another Urban myth debunked just like the grassiness in dry hopping.
I am beginning to think that some of these things we have come to believe over the years are created to sell items by manufacturers with no more than anecdotal stories and even some of us brewers convincing ourselves that we have seen improvements in our actions that have not been there. can you remember the one that " Starsan is no good if it goes milky" how many more are there out there.
Maybe I'm becoming a Flat Earther!!!
Ok thanks for that Mmmbeer maybe stick to the way I’ve always been doing it then , thought there might be a reasonThe theory is that using pure wort will cause a large osmotic pressure between the inside of the yest cells and the liquid outside, which can cause yeast death. The ideal situation would be making up a solution of weak wort at 30-35 C, but water is better than pure wort.
I will check the brew fridge tomorrow to see what make it was, but the only instructions I have seen are pitch direct or cooled wort.never seen it on a yeast packet before, how long have you been doing it that way then mate? I must admit I do like the sound of it and am definitely going for it on my next brew
Enter your email address to join: