You won't get it. You don't get it.
No one is claiming it makes better beer. It's just one method of making beer, no better, no worse. An alternative way of reducing esters, than lowering temperature. Which itself increases the amount of Co2 in solution.
You've been extremely light on proof as to why no one else is able to make quality beer under pressure, just because you failed.
I have pointed to the proof, check out what a Charlie Bamforth and Jens Eiken Master Brewer has to say, why the professional brewers give it a wide berth, why Gordon Strong or John palmer or any of the respected writers of home brewing don't mention it. It is only some of the home brewers who have been taken in by all the spin on Youtube and other blogs that lays claim that top pressure is better, not necessarily for the home brewer, but certainly for those in the business of home brew supplies.
I think Jamil Zainasheff who is the author of the brewing books, Brewing Classic Styles, Yeast, pod cast host, professional brewer, Certified Beer Judge, award winning home brewer, taken awards in the NHC every year since 2002, with over 20 best in show. I think is more qualified than most homebrewers to say a few words on the subject, no doubt you will know more than him.
Jamil Zainasheff (Heretic Brewing) kindly responded to a query I made in his AMA thread on the topic of high pressure brewing of lagers:
“I have not done a lot of it, but I did experiment with it back in the day and found the results were not as good as normal lager fermentation. We also did a couple Brew Strong shows about the technique, with some sensory data from experiments that John Blichmann did at varying pressures and temperatures.
The idea behind high pressure brewing is to take advantage of the effect increased pressure has in reducing ester production at higher temperatures. If you are running a massive commercial brewery and can pay less for cooling and perhaps turn a tank faster, then that adds up to $$$. Never mind that it doesn't make as good a lager, you were able to make it cheaper, and you assume your customers would rather have cheaper lager than better lager.
It is an interesting idea, that the increase in dissolved CO2 suppresses ester production. If you ferment a beer cold, there is more dissolved CO2 in the beer during most of fermentation. If CO2 is the key, then you should be able to keep just as much CO2 in solution by raising the pressure to account for your higher beer temperature. If your beer temperature is higher, you should see faster yeast activity as well.
I think the reason many homebrewers are interested in it is 1) it is another cool thing to try and 2) many don't have access to proper temperature control for lagers.
The issue is, it doesn't taste as good as a proper made lager. It isn't terrible and I guess, if you really were desperate to make a lager, didn't have refrigeration, and were OK with an OK version of a lager, then it probably does make sense to high pressure brew.”