nelson smash

The Homebrew Forum

Help Support The Homebrew Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

mishking

Active Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2016
Messages
27
Reaction score
8
Location
Bristol
Looking to move on from all grain kits and start whacking my own stuff together for the grain father.

I want to try and get a lowish abv brew on the go and figured id start with something fairly simple.

Looking at:

23ltr Brew

3.8kg Maris Otter

10g Magnum at 60 mins

5g Nelson at 30 mins
15g Nelson at 20 mins
15g Nelson at 10 mins
15g Nelson at 0 mins

What do you guys reckon?

Cheers,
Greg
 
Right im going to go with the below as per beer cats recommendation.

Hops:

15g at 15
15g at 5
20g at 0

Not sure on the dry hop yet, cross that bridge when i get to it.
 
That's not a smash :D

This is quite clearly correct.

I have done similar, though, using the hop of choice for the later additions and a high alpha hop for the bittering hop at 60m. I am not aware of any drop-off in the end product due to this.

I am, though, talking about a 23L brew using ~ 100g of hops.
 
You can still keep your bittering if you prefer just adjust your Nelson hops to the AA% of the Magnum or if your Magnum is 10% and 5% Nelson just double your weight.Enjoy and hope you SMaSH it....

Sent from my ALE-L21 using Tapatalk
 
Nelson Sauvin intrigues me quite a bit. I'm tempted to make a version of Greg Hughes' Patersbier but using NS. Since that beer is all pilsner malt it's essentially a pilsner/saas smash as written.
 
Did you brew this yet? I know its probably obvious but mine tastes like white wine. Cant say i like it very much. Its still green although my citra smath was amazing after 3 weeks. Still blended with the citra its drinkable and a good experiment.
 
SMaSH beers are a good way to learn about malts and hops and to get a feel for different tastes, aromas and mouthfeels. That said, it's rare to find a hop or a malt that can't be improved in combination. The same is also very much the case with yeast.

I sometimes think that while SMaSH beers can form part of a learning curve, you have to question whether the time to brew one is the best use of time and resources, unless of course there's a hop or malt that you like so much you want it in isolation. Part of the magic of brewing is getting the combinations to a balance that works for you.
 
The OP's brew should turn out not dissimilar to Thornbridge Kipling, single malt to 5%, 40-45ibu of magnum and flame out about 50g of Nelson's, you can get the recipe in Euan Fergusons http://amzn.to/2uBwJPK book it's a great beer and a nice simple recipe.
 
Not put this on yet as i had been busy and the subsequent hot weather has put me off as i have no temperature control.

Interesting comments on the NS BeerCat. Im thinking i might leave the NS and do an all citra or amarillo smash first. Get some under my belt and then have a crack at the NS.

Be interesting to see how that brew mellows out.
 
I sometimes think that while SMaSH beers can form part of a learning curve, you have to question whether the time to brew one is the best use of time and resources, unless of course there's a hop or malt that you like so much you want it in isolation.

I have the same issues with SMaSH beers, being still fairly new to brewing my methodical, scientifically inclined side says I should do some smash beers to test out my ingredients. But people often say they are nice but a bit one dimensional, so I don't want to put in the time to brew and then drink a heap of fairly ordinary beers.

My most recent brew is close at 87% Maris Otter, 13% Munich then hopped with Galaxy.

I might brew up a batch of wort and fine a way to boil it up in 1 gallon batches each with a different hop, but that sounds like a long day and a lot of boiling losses.

Nelson Sauvin is one of the hops I want to try in isolation.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top