fbsf said:In what way Andy?
Certainly from the perspective that you can create whatever style and flavour you want, there's a huge difference.
Quality wise, if you are using very fresh liquid malt or dry malt, then the resulting beer should taste better, without that twang you can get from kits.
Andyhull said:I thought the malt makes a difference to the brew too, not just the hops!
alanywiseman said:Just about to move to extract but from the kits that I have added extra hops and malts, extract is sure to be an improvment on kits and slightly cheaper :thumb:
fbsf said:Andyhull said:I thought the malt makes a difference to the brew too, not just the hops!
Indeed it does - you can choose different types of liquid/dry malts (light, medium, dark, wheat etc), and if you want to take it further, you can also steep other malts such as chocolate or crystal to get different colours.
Andyhull said:I have looked into this but couldn't see that there would be that much difference from kits!
I'm all set up to go AG now anyhow but havn't got the time to do it just yet (and i got 3 woodfordes kits for £13.99 each)
Andyhull said:alanywiseman said:Just about to move to extract but from the kits that I have added extra hops and malts, extract is sure to be an improvment on kits and slightly cheaper :thumb:
I have looked into this but couldn't see that there would be that much difference from kits!
I'm all set up to go AG now anyhow but havn't got the time to do it just yet (and i got 3 woodfordes kits for £13.99 each)
The only thing you need extra to go AG from extract is a mashtun or BIAB bag and they're easy to make!
Andyhull said:I'll be moving on to AG and bypassing extrac.
I wasn't saying that it wasn't any better than kits my original post was to ask that exact question, is there a significant difference, and by the sounds of it there is :lol: