- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Messages
- 993
- Reaction score
- 2,058
Very nice of you to say soHe's a nice bloke that Norm.
Very nice of you to say soHe's a nice bloke that Norm.
Salary capping feels like it might solve some things, and I agree with the sentiment of fairness - but don't you think it punishes success for entrepreneurial start ups that take a personal risk and make it big? It also discourages large organisations from hiring the best talent who can create wealth and more employment.Isn't it all about balance?
You need a little bit of Socialism to make life fairer for everyone.
But you also need to look after No. 1
And no extremes of either.
If I had to do one thing to make things a bit fairer, I would pass a law that says the Boss of a company can only earn 10* the salary of the lowest paid in his company including scams like bonuses & share options.
Other than that, I am probably moderate right wing.
That's quite alright NH, see you thanked me, so you must be niceVery nice of you to say so
I read that thread before. For me it is not accurate particularly on the moral questions which is why so many are surprised at their result.Members reading this may be interested in this thread - The Political Compass
As I said, far too obvious.What a waste of popcorn this has been. Threads not even been locked...
If I had to do one thing to make things a bit fairer, I would pass a law that says the Boss of a company can only earn 10* the salary of the lowest paid in his company including scams like bonuses & share options.
The trouble with social injustice is that disliking it alone isn't going to change anything.I think most of us are in the same boat just ordinary working class people who want to get on with things but don't like social injustice.
You make light, but revolution is the only way forward.Come the REVOLUTION brother brewers we will control all bottled water and tap water profiles to suit relevant brewing styles
⚒⚒⚒
I don't even think that it fits the conditions for a theory. A theory is supported by hard facts and experiments. If it isn't, it is a hypothesis.Socialism is an economic and political system. It is an economic theory of social organization. It that the means of making, moving, and trading wealth should be owned or controlled by the workers. This means the money made belongs to the workers who make the products, instead of groups of private owners. People who agree with this type of system are called socialists.
That is all it is, a theory. A theory which does not, and cannot work, there hasn't been a socialist/labor government ever which hasn't rooted the economy of that country.
Take away incentive and reap the consequences.
Enter your email address to join: