An Ankoù
Landlord.
When I was a lad, Guinness was an acquired taste; I recall it was quite bitter and, if you weren't used to it, it had the reputation that it could give you the "threepenny bits". I don't recognise the bland, over-chilled drink that passes for draught Guinness nowadays, and yet they insist it hasn't changed. There was also a noticeable difference betwen the Guinness brewed in London (I think) and that brewed in Ireland.The cynic in me says it's an artificial scarcity for marketing purposes. Reading an article in the Telegraph, however, some pubs have switched to Murphys and have found their customers pleasantly surprised with some preferring it. I don't rate Guinness personally, it's all (extremely skillful) marketing of a very average macro beer. Much prefer Murphys in that category, and as has been said already, there are much better offerings from smaller breweries.
Perhaps its my sense of taste that has changed, but I don't think so- a chicken phall still tastes the same as it did when i was 16!