tubthumper said:
markp said:
Why would you want or need to do a decoction with well modified lager malt??
reason to is if the recipe call for any cooked cereals as these benefit from the low temp 40-50C
Actually if using
uncooked cereals you (corn meal , grits, rice) then you need to do a cereal mash which is not a decoction mash . . . Cooked cereals like flaked maize, and Flaked Rice do not need the cereal mash as the starch in them has already been gelatinised.
The reason I would do a decoction mash with well modified malt is to develop the flavour profiles that you get from decoction mashing. The period of boiling at the end of the decoction mash . . . apart from making more starch available also encourages the formation of melanoidins from a reaction between carbohydrates and proteins . . . this leads to a darkening of the wort, plus the development of a really nice malty profile. However, with well modified malt I would only go with a single 'thin' decoction, from whatever mash temp I was using (probably 66C) up to 72C for a mash out. . . . A thin decoction takes mostly liquid which is required at the end of the boil, for intermediate decoctions you take a thick decoction which is mostly grain.
tubthumper said:
also the guys that use HERMS and rims swear by them .
I tend to swear at mine at the moment
, but step mashing is also not the same as decoction, and does not encourage the same flavours to develop, as there is no boiling phase
tubthumper said:
if you like the results surely you would repeat whether or not it was scientific or not.
Blindly following commercial practice of 40 years ago without regard to the modern ingredients could very well lead down a dark path where it's better not to go. :) Decoction Mashing is very much more of an art that a scientific process . . . although there are very valid scientific reasons for each of the steps involved, once you understand the reasons for the steps then you can adapt the science through the craft of brewing to create art . . .
Beer :lol: