Clogged vinometer

The Homebrew Forum

Help Support The Homebrew Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

tonyhibbett

Landlord.
Joined
Oct 24, 2010
Messages
2,725
Reaction score
159
Location
Isleworth, Middlesex
It doesn't take long for the very thin tube to become unusable due to a build up of residue. I tried detergent and strong alcohol but to no avail. Eventually blowing hard from the narrow end did the trick. However I discovered there is an alcohol refractometer which has a range of 0-80%, dead easy to clean and costs as little as £10, post free from China, so I have ordered one.
 
The alcohol refractometer has arrived but didn't work as expected. It turns out it is only suitable for spirits. I tested 40% abv white rum and got an accurate reading. Corvoisier brandy (40%) read 43%, Tequila and Bells whisky (40%) 38%. Curiously, Grand Marnier and Cointreau (40%) didn't register at all, whereas ouzo (40%) registered 47%!
However a range of wines with known strength produced results in the range of 18-22.5! A pattern emerged. When you subtract 9 you get the right result. This is because wine contains many ingredients, which are removed by distillation, which influence the refractive index.
Even a dry wine may contain up to 2% unfermented sugar plus acids, glycerine and so forth. Fortunately I have a sugar refractometer which I use for testing grapes. For all the wines tested with this I got consistent readings of 7-8 brix. As the wines were dry/medium dry, clearly they did not contain 7-8% sugar, as the reading suggests.
In order to establish how much alcohol affects the specific gravity, I tested the rum and got a reading of 14 brix, roughly one third of the abv and the equivalent of sg 1055. Divided by 4, the results would be 10% abv and 3.5 brix, sg 1013. I have read that a grape sugar refractometer becomes progressively less accurate at measuring sugar below 15 brix due to other elements in the juice.
Simply subtracting 9 from the alcohol refractometer readings of wine is good enough for me but there are cases where this number should be lower or higher than that. For example fino (dry) sherry at 15% abv read 22% abv and brix 7, which gives the correct result of 15% abv. A dry dandelion wine made with a low grape content (20%) read 19% abv and brix 7, giving 12% abv, also correct. Other dry/medium dry wines with a low fruit content (which include most kit wines) gave a brix reading of 7, whereas true wines (100% grape) read 8, with no difference between reds and whites, except the fino sherry and sake, but the dry white wine required a deduction of only 6 to give the true result. This is because reds are heavier.
However, when I tested port (20% with a high sugar content) I got a reading of 60% abv and 18 brix, which gives 42% abv, more than double the true value! My 'Sauternes' (sweet) read 30% and 11 brix, giving an unlikely 19% abv, (although 18% is possible without fortification). Pure mead (medium, 12% abv) gave 23%abv and 9 brix, giving 14% due to the higher sugar content, so 11 needed to be deducted. On the other hand, Pimms (25% and dry) read 40% abv and brix 14%, which gives about the right result.
The lowest reading was my sake (pure rice wine - no grape or added sugar) was 17% abv and brix 7, giving 10% abv. This is usually brewed to 18% abv but sold at 15%. All I can say is that mine certainly tastes a lot stronger than 10%! The lowest known strength tested was medium dry perry at 7.5% abv, which read 18%abv and 7 brix. To get the correct result, 10.5 would need to be subtracted which suggests that as the actual abv falls, the greater the correction required, but then 7.5 is not strictly speaking wine anyway.
 
Grand Marnier and Cointreau contain about 25% sugar, which is why the readings are of the scale.
Further tests suggest that for true reds, subtracting the brix (B) value plus 1 from the alcohol refractometer (AR) reading gives the correct result, based on 2 commercial wines.
Merlot : B=8, +1=9, AR=21. 21-9=12% abv, as stated on label.
Italian Red: B=8, +1-9, AR=22. 22-9=13% abv, as stated on label.
Examples of my dry whites, made with 100% grapes. The OG was 1090, brix 22, so the calculated abv was 12%.
Fragolino: B=8, +1=9, AR=21. 21-9=12%.
Riesling: B=8, +1=9, AR=21. 21-9=12%.
Dry country white wines with significantly less grape content and therefore lighter, work out without the extra 1.
Rhubarb: B=8, AR=22. 22-8=12%.
Elderflower: B=7, AR=19. 19-7=12%.
Dandelion : B=7, AR=19. 19-7=12%.
The mead was an anomaly, being medium rather than dry and with no grape content.
Mead: B=9, AR=23. 23-9= 14%, which is incorrect. An extra 2 needs to be deducted due to the sugar content. However, I found a calculator which uses brix rather than sg to work out the abv and produce the following table and a more accurate result for mead.
OG OBRIX FBRIX ABV
1090 22 6 14
7 13.4
8 12.6
9 11.9 (Mead)
It seems there is a relationship between final gravity and final refractive index which can be used to calculate abv but for this you need a special Zeiss wine refractometer, which is rather expensive.
 
One thing which puzzled me is why a hydrometer reading can drop below sg 1.000 but not a refractometer. The answer is that alcohol is both thicker yet lighter than water. The sg of pure alcohol is 0.790, way off my brewing hydrometer, which is graduated down to 0.980.
The lowest reading I got from a wine was 0.990, which was a dry sherry at 15%. As pure alcohol, the sg would be 0.976. At the other end was a sweet dessert wine at 18% abv with a gravity well above 1.000 on account of the sugar content.
Wine contains, among other things, acids, glycerine, non-fermentable and unfermented sugars, all of which raise the sg above that of water. However, a refractometer is measuring 'thickness', as opposed to 'weight', so the alcohol gives a higher reading than water, along with sugar etc. Neither the 'sugar' nor the 'alcohol' refractometer can distinguish the difference, hence the very high readings for the wines tested, while the readings for the 'clean', sugar-free spirits were pretty accurate.
Obviously sugar is significant. Each 1 gram per litre (typically the minimum residual sugar in wine) increases the brix value by 1 on the sugar refractometer and 3% on the alcohol one. The same ratio between the two (approx 1:3) is reflected in all the readings.
Typically there is about 1% glycerine in most wines, which has the same effect but acids have an even greater influence. Typically 5 ppt (0.1%) tartaric acid, usually the minimum, has the same effect. Adding the three together, you get, respectively, 3 and 9, which accounts for the readings I was getting for the dry/medium dry wines.
I found an anomaly with my oak matured chardonnay. 14 gallons were divided between 2 polypins and 16 bottles. Samples from Each gave different results:
Polypin 1,(22 litres from top of cask): B=8, AR=18. Approx 10% abv
Polypin 2, (22 litres from middle of cask): B-7, AR=20. Approx 13% abv
Bottle (13 litres, the remainder): B=7, AR=22. Approx 15% abv.
Alcohol starts to evaporate at 60% humidity, and as the cask was stored outside, there were occasions when the humidity exceeded this. Most of the alcohol escapes from the top of the cask but concentrates lower down, due to the evaporation of water. Averaging the three results gave the expected 12% abv.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top