It seems a certain group of people who had never previously showed any concern for Parliamentary procedures, are now getting terribly upset because it was suggested MPs don't say anything about the Southport case to avoid prejudicing the legal case against him. Which is self-evidently a sensible thing to do, but doesn't stop some people posturing about it.
Sorry yes you are right it was Nusrat Chani,
When in the chamber they have free reign so she basically interfered in the democratic right of mp's, it has also been said by some people who have worked in high office that this information would have been known to government with a couple of hours of what happened and should have been made public suggesting had they done so the riots would not have happened
Why do our national representatives have to act like they're at a child's Christmas pantomime when they're discussing matters that affect the livelihoods of millions?Might be this, which is obviously very sinister.
They don't have free reign.
Exactly my thoughts.
I agree and that is right, but yesterday she the dep speaker made specific reference that no one talked about it, and as lots of prominent people have said Starmer and co would have known the same day and want to know why it has taken since July to announce it
