Ale-in-France
Active Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2012
- Messages
- 24
- Reaction score
- 0
Not really a question - although it does lead to one.
Have been double batching a bit recently, putting new batch onto the sludge at the bottom of the previous batch in order to save on yeast costs (and cos I forgot to do a starter batch). I've racked the first batch into a secondary to ferment out and poured cooled wort straight onto cake.
Weird thing is that both times the second batch has been finished before the first. I guess all the active yeast from the first batch reaklly goes to work on the second one so it goes quicker, but am surprised that the first batch is still bubbling away at 1020 while an almost identical batch brewed a week later is down at about 1012.
Which leads to the question: is it better to have a really fast ferment, or a slow one? Any difference in flavour?
Have been double batching a bit recently, putting new batch onto the sludge at the bottom of the previous batch in order to save on yeast costs (and cos I forgot to do a starter batch). I've racked the first batch into a secondary to ferment out and poured cooled wort straight onto cake.
Weird thing is that both times the second batch has been finished before the first. I guess all the active yeast from the first batch reaklly goes to work on the second one so it goes quicker, but am surprised that the first batch is still bubbling away at 1020 while an almost identical batch brewed a week later is down at about 1012.
Which leads to the question: is it better to have a really fast ferment, or a slow one? Any difference in flavour?