There's nothing wrong with wearing a hi-viz jacket. I used to do when I rode me bike.You're probably right and no lights is just plain stupid. However talking about clothing is too close to victim blaming for me to ignore.
and yes, if you drive into the back of someone then it is your fault!
So, if it doesn't make a quantifiable difference why are you wearing one????? The more visible a cyclist is, the less chance he has of not being observed.Got nothing against cyclists wearing hi-viz, I do it myself. However, I do have a problem with people blaming cyclists if they aren't wearing it, when there's little to suggest it actually makes a quantifiable difference.
So, if it doesn't make a quantifiable difference why are you wearing one????? The more visible a cyclist is, the less chance he has of not being observed.
From observing other cyclist I'm convinced that a large amount of them are completely unaware vehicles have blind spots
So, if it doesn't make a quantifiable difference why are you wearing one????? The more visible a cyclist is, the less chance he has of not being observed.
The problem is, that many accidents occur when a cyclist is in a vehicle's blind spot. So it doesnt matter if your lit up like a christmas tree. From observing other cyclist I'm convinced that a large amount of them are completely unaware vehicles have blind spots
Do you have a source for this? I'd wager that more accidents involving cyclists is down to lack of care from motorists and dangerous driving.
I'm not defending all cyclists, btw, but the numbers of careless cyclists is so insignificant that it shouldn't be used to create a victim-blaming attitude when it comes to making roads safer for all.
Piece on high-vis clothing - https://www.cyclingweekly.com/news/...sory-reduce-number-crashes-study-finds-374898
The summation is that high-vis may make you more visible but it doesn't reduce accidents as that is down to lack of care/poor driving.
Clearly you don't encounter the same group of cyclists that I do as I ride and drive around the roads in my area. I sometimes think 'death wish' when I see some of them., but the numbers of careless cyclists is so insignificant
You are spot on there. The number of cyclists who seem to be of the opinion that they are invulnerable when they get on the saddle irrespective of where they are and what the traffic conditions are, is as you say amazing. And its all types, varying from the arrogant club types riding two abreast in a line of 30 bikes down a busy narrow road to 'youfs' riding with no lights etc as @Dutto said earlier .But the amount of other cyclist I see putting themselves in potentially dangerous situations because they dont seem to be aware of their suroundings is quite amazing. I think being aware of how the most common accidents occur can prevent you being a victim of one of those accidents yourself
I cycle in a defensive manner, and try to put myself in the car seat of the cars around me. Imagining what they will see and whether I am in a position that they will see me. I take it as a given there will alwaly be a certain percentage of numpties behind the wheel and do my best to account for this
Not sure if I’ve posted this before but it’s worth redoing
That is a good point, have you ever had a passenger in your car who is a driver and when approaching a junction will tell you it's clear or not without being asked a non driving passer wouldn't give it a thought.
Spot on Dutto. Telling the magistrate that your passenger said it was all clear, won't stand up in court.Sorry, but I don't take ANY action on the basis of what ANY passenger says AFTER No.3 son said "Clear left ........"
".......... after the red car!"
Believing his first two words, I had moved forward about a yard before hitting the brakes to avoid a serious collision.
Enter your email address to join: