He's too bitter to be peachy so I would agree with more orangy...Hmmm - Trump is Orangy - Peaches are orangy - If he gets 'peached twice will that make him more or less orangy?
He's too bitter to be peachy so I would agree with more orangy...Hmmm - Trump is Orangy - Peaches are orangy - If he gets 'peached twice will that make him more or less orangy?
I hope it will make him more orangey - that's what they wear in American prisonsHmmm - Trump is Orangy - Peaches are orangy - If he gets 'peached twice will that make him more or less orangy?
I love a lot of his music.
We're behind the eight ball, we're out of chalk, the cue is warped, the felt has tears in it and the table is on an angle disadvantageous to the planned shot. It's going to be slow and painful and will take years. I'm not sure how you gleaned a positive, past four years for us. POTUS says it but it doesn't bear out the statistics on the US government website.Before making a decision on the performance of Trump I think it would be wise to see how his replacement performs. So many times leaders have been replaced by someone completely worse. Forget the personality traits, it is about who could/will serve the country better.
Lets just see the improvements/recessions the next four years bring, looking at the state of America at the moment I can't see any improvements on the horizon.
Keep in mind that the American economy is so huge that it takes MANY months to influence it to rise or fall and make no mistake about it trump is leaving Biden a colossal fustercluck to deal with.Lets just see the improvements/recessions the next four years bring, looking at the state of America at the moment I can't see any improvements on the horizon.
I liken his term to a wall full of laser lights darting about (scandals/mischief) and a cat (all of us) staring up at them trying to address each and every one at the same time.All this talk about how to judge Trump
Just judge him by the riots he incited last week
Perhaps incited by Trump and his insistence that there had been voter fraudAccording to a CNN article with multiple sources, possibly ten more House Republicans would have voted to impeach had the vote been secret. They were afraid for their families.
I don't see the Senate having any less worry about that factor. VP Mike Pence, loyal as the day is long, got death threats because he didn't try to violate the US Constitution.
I would say, as they might in Minnesota, "You betcha!" I try not to generalize, group bad apples with the rest. There are two things going on here, in my opinion: far-right extremists and malleable people caught in the undertow. The former would try shenanigans no matter what but weren't tamped down for four years running. The latter believe POTUS (despite the multitude of reasons they should not) and are outraged, fear that our democratic republic has already fallen based on what you mentioned.Perhaps incited by Trump and his insistence that there had been voter fraud
Uffda!I would say, as they might in Minnesota, "You betcha!"
Protecting America from one particular American would be a start. From a UK perspective Trump appears as anti-democratic and an autocrat. His style of “leadership “ and the deepening division of the USA rather underlines why he (thinks he) gets on with the N Korean dictatorship. If he continues bleating about voter fraud, the fact is that had the process been a simple popular vote, Hilary Clinton would be the one chanting “four more years”. Perhaps he should run for the Ukrainian hot seat instead?Now we have 25K armed National Guard (different than US military) crowded in the Capitol and surrounding area. Unheard of, obscene that it is necessary to protect America from Americans.
It's like saying Fred West was a good guy because there have been other serial killers.
My point is that if the USA is a nation of laws, then they need to be enforced equally. Unequal enforcement is driving a wedge between groups of people, making things less stable.What's your point @johnny108 ? Is this some straw man argument pointing out what other people say justifying what somebody else says? Is this your dad's a ****, well your dad's a murderer again?
If you're going to say something then say it so we know what you mean.
Protecting America from one particular American would be a start. From a UK perspective Trump appears as anti-democratic and an autocrat. His style of “leadership “ and the deepening division of the USA rather underlines why he (thinks he) gets on with the N Korean dictatorship. If he continues bleating about voter fraud, the fact is that had the process been a simple popular vote, Hilary Clinton would be the one chanting “four more years”. Perhaps he should run for the Ukrainian hot seat instead?Now we have 25K armed National Guard (different than US military) crowded in the Capitol and surrounding area. Unheard of, obscene that it is necessary to protect America from Americans.
Taking statements quite out of context. I see it relentlessly pushed on FOX.The charge for Trump's impeachment is "incitement of insurrection".
I'm just gonna leave this here:
“There will be blood in the streets.” — Loretta Lynch
“Who says protest have to be peaceful?” — Chris Cuomo
“There needs to be unrest in the streets.” — Ayanna Pressley
“Protesters should not let up.” — Kamala Harris
“I just don’t know why there aren’t uprisings all over the
country and maybe there will be.” — Nancy Pelosi
“You get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them
and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.” — Maxine Waters
Enter your email address to join: