http://www.dudadiesel.com/heat_exchangers.php
Chart for heat exchangers:
Belter, the difference in price is down to the efficiency. It really is a question of how water efficient and time efficient do you "need" to be?
For a 20 litre batch size you could use a 20 plate, it would take 7.5minutes and use 77 gallons of water (according to that chart) (B3-12A 20 plate)
For a 20 litre batch size you could use a 30 plate, it would take 2.5 minutes and use 26 gallons of water. (B3-23A 30 plate)
For a 20 litre batch size you could use a 60 plate, it would take 2 minutes and use 20 gallons of water. (B3-23A 60 plate)
For a 20 litre batch size you could use a 60 plate, it would take 11 seconds and use 1.8 gallons of water. (B3-95A 60 plate) (provided you could pump that fast!!!)
Now I've just put those in, as you can see between the 2 60 plate exchangers there is a big difference in time and water used. From an industry standpoint, I cannot honestly think of a reason why you would want your cooler to be the bottleneck in your system, therefore you'd go for the biggest meanest HE you could find. Transfering 23 gallons of wort a minute though, for homebrew use just isn't needed. (no matter how die hard you are on saving water, I think this is a bit much )
this would work quite well, basically anything in the B3-23A range or higher is good, if you click on any of the HE's Clive listed and scroll down to the top of the product listing under the ebay gumph, it has a code written in black, they're all B3-**A.
All depends how much you want to spend, I am looking purely at the table supplied to come to my conclusions and they're not from experience (my IC works just fine), perhaps someone with a 12A product could correct me, but from that table, if you want to save on water you'd be looking at something like i said. Do not confuse more plates with being better. More plates means greater surface area and as a result use less water to cool the same amount of wort, they are also more expensive and more difficult to clean (more plates, more crannies), that 30 plate i listed uses 6GPM more than the 60 plate, and will take an additional 30 seconds, but it will be easier to clean and just over half the size (4mm). Hopefully my explanation hasn't been too confusing and you can see how I've arrived at my conclusion and now understand enough to come up with your own, safe in the knowledge you're buying the right one for your needs.
I've copied this from the other forum, with the accompanying charts. I believe as the serial numbers are the same, it is very likely they are from the same supplier. I am not sure what difference the serial actually makes and HOW exactly they transfer more heat, I'm guessing it's to do with either the material used to join the plates (different grade of copper perhaps?) or a change of some sort in the internal plate design (like ridges or channels). But going off that chart, I'd say the 30 plate looks like the "best" option. The 60 for the same price doesn't really offer much in the way of benefit and has more plates to worry about getting clean. Of course, thats from the charts, so there is every chance they're wrong and then of course, so am i.