welly3
Well-Known Member
Seems to be your claiming that they are trustworthy. Where are the citations for that.
You're the one making the claim that he is being paid to lie. I've got no reason to disbelieve him. You obviously do, based on your inside information that he's being paid to lie. I'm quite happy to be corrected.
Just to clarify, I'm not making any claim he is trustworthy just that I have no evidence or reason to believe this particular person is not. So with your assertion he's being paid to lie, then you must have some reason or evidence or anything to give you that suggestion. Otherwise it's meaningless conjecture.