- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Messages
- 2,516
- Reaction score
- 2,403
What do you mean by "solve" in this case? The congestion charge reduced traffic by 15% per the link above - what level of traffic would you regard as "solving" "congestion"? Reducing traffic by 30%? 50%? Because you can do that, just by increasing the charge. Heck, make it £1000/day and you'd have almost no traffic at all, just Ferraris and Rolls Royces bombing up and down the streets of central London.Yep, get that. I suppose the point I was trying to make was that the introduction of a congestion charging zone has not solved the issue of congestion and the ULEZ zone has not solved the issue of polluted air. They were clearly never designed to do so, they were designed to raise revenue only.
You seem to be saying the problem with the congestion charge is that it isn't high enough to reduce traffic by the amount you want.