EasyDean
New Member
Hi All
I used to do a bit of home brewing many years ago using kits from boots, but today I'm back into it and really want/need to fast-track some experience in current home brew techniques etc.
I have a plan to do some brewing with the aim to get as much and as broad an amount of knowledge as possible and cram it into a short period of time.
The plan is to create 3 separate brews, one with a kit, one with extract, and a third as 'AG'. Fortunately I have access to whatever equipment and ingredients that I might need.
My first idea is to brew Brupaks London Bitter, as they do a complete kit in a tin, a kit that requires malt extract (craftsman), and a 'mashkit' which is the 'AG' equivalent. I'm guessing that following the same recipe in all 3 scenarios will enable me to understand the taste and aroma differences between the three methods. Is this a reasonable assumption ?
Also, the Brupaks London Bitter complete kit is for 10 litres - I'm assuming there'll be no difference between brewing 10 litres and 20 litres (apart from the quantity of beer of course).
I'm going to use 23 litre plastic and 23 litre glass demijohns with airlocks. I can get a Brupaks boiler, mash tun and hop strainer for the extract and AG versions.
I'm going to put some in Cornelius Kegs, some in King Kegs and some in bottles, so I can get a handle on the differences.
My main question is - are there any flaws in this idea ?
Does anyone know if there is anything I can do in addition to this that'll broaden my experience in the short term ?
I know that it takes a lot of experience over a long period of time to become anything like an expert, but I'd like to become a competent 'all rounder' as soon as possible, and then grow my knowledge in the normal way from there.
I know this is an odd question, but any comments will be greatly received.
Dean
I used to do a bit of home brewing many years ago using kits from boots, but today I'm back into it and really want/need to fast-track some experience in current home brew techniques etc.
I have a plan to do some brewing with the aim to get as much and as broad an amount of knowledge as possible and cram it into a short period of time.
The plan is to create 3 separate brews, one with a kit, one with extract, and a third as 'AG'. Fortunately I have access to whatever equipment and ingredients that I might need.
My first idea is to brew Brupaks London Bitter, as they do a complete kit in a tin, a kit that requires malt extract (craftsman), and a 'mashkit' which is the 'AG' equivalent. I'm guessing that following the same recipe in all 3 scenarios will enable me to understand the taste and aroma differences between the three methods. Is this a reasonable assumption ?
Also, the Brupaks London Bitter complete kit is for 10 litres - I'm assuming there'll be no difference between brewing 10 litres and 20 litres (apart from the quantity of beer of course).
I'm going to use 23 litre plastic and 23 litre glass demijohns with airlocks. I can get a Brupaks boiler, mash tun and hop strainer for the extract and AG versions.
I'm going to put some in Cornelius Kegs, some in King Kegs and some in bottles, so I can get a handle on the differences.
My main question is - are there any flaws in this idea ?
Does anyone know if there is anything I can do in addition to this that'll broaden my experience in the short term ?
I know that it takes a lot of experience over a long period of time to become anything like an expert, but I'd like to become a competent 'all rounder' as soon as possible, and then grow my knowledge in the normal way from there.
I know this is an odd question, but any comments will be greatly received.
Dean