richc said:That is because the Belgian brewers have been really clever and redefined everything that is usually a flaw as a feature. This means you can never say that a Belgian beer is wrong, just that it is interesting ;-)Moley said:I could definitely detect sweaty socks, horse blanket and balsamic vinegar in some of Unclepumble's supposedly fine (and probably rather expensive) fruity Belgian lambics which were being circulated at the Spring Thing.
Luckyeddie: I was rather hoping you would make it along to the Spring Thing and bring along some of these Belgian brews you are producing.luckyeddie said:To tell the truth, the loony juice I have been brewing of late would put me on my back if I drank 4 grolsch bottles worth. I'm now brewing beer at somewhere between TC and wine strength. Curse those Trappist monks and their wonderful grainbills, fantastic yeasts and yummy candi sugar.
On the Friday evening in particular, we were treated (if that's the right word) to a selection of fruity lambics by UP. I can honestly say that nothing has ever prepared my taste buds for an assault of that nature.
As a winemaker I am accustomed to fruity notes, but sour fruity notes with a hint of vinegar, a malty body and a head? :shock: :wha:
Love it or hate it? I really can't decide.
I think I understand the idea of Dubbels and Tripels and candi sugar and peoples who can't spell, but I would find it really helpful if LuckyEddie, LancsSteve, UP or any of the other cognoscenti could explain (in simple terms) the varieties available, what might be considered good but fairly ânormalâ and where the Bretty yeasties kick in.