This is the problem - even sending troops, even with equipment, is unlikely to alter the situation because **** Can did not even sent consripts to the war yet, he keeps stockpiling on modern weapons by not sending the best to the war, except for testing, upgraded his nuclear arsenal, and sent only about a third his army into the combat. We all know that Zelenski lacks manpower though he recently claimed he lost 31k people dead (don't think he is liying, only using different calculations that allows him to lower the number vs conventional way) https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-68397525That is where we have to draw the line we cannot get directly involved with troops on the ground or we will be heading for WW3
On top of it, how can you give what Zelenski needs if Germany left only 20k high explosive shells in the stock? This can be consumed in half a day https://www.reuters.com/world/europ...sive-artillery-shells-left-report-2023-06-19/ . Denmark sent its entire artillery park to Ukraine and this did not even make a dent https://www.euractiv.com/section/politics/news/denmark-will-send-its-entire-artillery-to-ukraine/ . And, smilar to NATO, **** Can puts effective pressure on Soviet weaponry operators so that they do not sell Warsaw Pact ammunition and weaponry to the USA, so you cannot buy ammunition or weapons on the world market https://www.fruitnet.com/eurofruit/russia-lifts-ban-on-ecuadorean-bananas/258658.article . High energy costs means that NATO buys an artillery round for $3-8k, while **** Can buy equal one for less than $40 from North Korea
Unfortunately, I do not see how the current status quo can be shifted
We personally will get underfunded NHS, education, roads etc, but get nothing from the gains - gains will be pocketed by very selected individuals (I already asked my pension fund to buy shared of US companies that produce weapons, so I do what I say)