morethanworts
Landlord.
It would seem I have been mashing lower than I thought.
My (glass) thermometer reads just under 1C (let's say 0.75) in ice water. It shows 102.5C in boiling water. We're at 46m above sea level, so it should be 99.85C I think. I've watched demos of how to take the measurements and have been as careful as I can.
So if it's +0.75C out at 0C and +2.65C out at 99.85C, by how much is it likely to be over at 66C? I'm going to have to make a very dubious assumption that the increase in inaccuracy is linear over the range, but I'm fairly happy that it will be close enough!
The difference in inaccuracy is 1.9C (from 0.75C to 2.65C) between the readings taken at 0C and 99.85C.
66C is 66.1% of the way towards 99.85 (from zero).
66.1% of 1.9C is 1.26C
1.26C plus the 0.75C it was already out at zero is +2.01C
So I guess, in the absence a thermometer that I know to be accurate at 66C, I must assume that my thermometer is about 2C over when taking mash temperatures.
Please point out any errors in the logic or execution!
My (glass) thermometer reads just under 1C (let's say 0.75) in ice water. It shows 102.5C in boiling water. We're at 46m above sea level, so it should be 99.85C I think. I've watched demos of how to take the measurements and have been as careful as I can.
So if it's +0.75C out at 0C and +2.65C out at 99.85C, by how much is it likely to be over at 66C? I'm going to have to make a very dubious assumption that the increase in inaccuracy is linear over the range, but I'm fairly happy that it will be close enough!
The difference in inaccuracy is 1.9C (from 0.75C to 2.65C) between the readings taken at 0C and 99.85C.
66C is 66.1% of the way towards 99.85 (from zero).
66.1% of 1.9C is 1.26C
1.26C plus the 0.75C it was already out at zero is +2.01C
So I guess, in the absence a thermometer that I know to be accurate at 66C, I must assume that my thermometer is about 2C over when taking mash temperatures.
Please point out any errors in the logic or execution!