Some Dog Owners .....

The Homebrew Forum

Help Support The Homebrew Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Chippy_Tea

Landlord.
Staff member
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Mar 17, 2013
Messages
54,015
Reaction score
20,980
Location
Ulverston Cumbria.
should be fined and banned from owning any animals, he should have put all the windows in.


aaaaaaaaaaaa.jpg


GMP Swinton ‏@GMPSwinton 2h2 hours ago
Would you put a dog in the oven? Clearly not. Why would you leave it in a hot car! This window just smashed by cops


.
 
Strangled at birth would get my vote! (The owner of course, not the dog!)

I've noticed some of your posts.

Calling the beloved Prince George a "murderous little git" I believe. Oooops. Apologies that was LarryF
Implying people who play Pokemon go should play in minefields.

Don't hold back Mate, tell us what you really think.:lol:
 
I've noticed some of your posts.

Calling the beloved Prince George a "murderous little git" I believe. Oooops. Apologies that was LarryF
Implying people who play Pokemon go should play in minefields.

Don't hold back Mate, tell us what you really think.:lol:

What got me really teed off is that the poor mutt hadn't even been shaved for the summer!

I used to take my two "down the the bone" as soon as the weather picked up. The problem with living in Scotland was that on many occasions the weather turned and it snowed within a few days of "hair cutting day".

When that happened I soon learned that "Filthy looks." weren't the sole preserve of humans! :lol: :lol:

The good news was that whenever I found a birds nest within 200 yards of our cottage it was invariably lined with Jake and Jessica's hair!
 
I've noticed some of your posts.

Calling the beloved Prince George a "murderous little git" I believe. Oooops. Apologies that was LarryF
Implying people who play Pokemon go should play in minefields.

Don't hold back Mate, tell us what you really think.:lol:

Im with Dutto on this.

Stephen Hawking recently said that "pollution and HUMAN STUPIDITY will destroy the earth".

Been saying it for years that 90% of the British people are stupid. Only have to see the Brain dead on the phone as the drive.

i blame Flouride in water and toothpaste. its been proven to lower IQ. Its how government control the masses along with Sport.
 
Im with Dutto on this.

Stephen Hawking recently said that "pollution and HUMAN STUPIDITY will destroy the earth".

Been saying it for years that 90% of the British people are stupid. Only have to see the Brain dead on the phone as the drive.

i blame Flouride in water and toothpaste. its been proven to lower IQ. Its how government control the masses along with Sport.

Oh poo, i didn't know that about fluoride, still I don't drink the crap that comes out of our tap! and I should be ok if I don't swallow any toothpaste whilst brushing.
 
Im with Dutto on this.

Stephen Hawking recently said that "pollution and HUMAN STUPIDITY will destroy the earth".

Been saying it for years that 90% of the British people are stupid. Only have to see the Brain dead on the phone as the drive.

i blame Flouride in water and toothpaste. its been proven to lower IQ. Its how government control the masses along with Sport.

When you think about it, it's a good job there's a few of decent intelligent chaps around. It's just we're slowly killing our brain cells with alcohol.
Being nearly eight in the evening here I'm doing that right now.

Actually thinking about now I read the other day that some woman left her kid in a car on that hot day you had this week.
No one started a thread about though. Obviously there's more love for dogs than kids here.:lol:
 
If you honestly believe that fluoride lowers IQ, there is less hope for humanity than I thought.

That kind of thing is right up there with MMR immunisation causing autism and man not landing on the moon...

Stop believing everything you read in the Sunday Sport and Daily Fail...

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

I think every intelligent person here (I'm assuming that's only a handful, as by definition, 90% here are apparently stupid..) knows the real danger is from the evil Dihydrogen Monoxide .Lots of it in Beer..:-(

http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html
 
Actually thinking about now I read the other day that some woman left her kid in a car on that hot day you had this week.
No one started a thread about though. Obviously there's more love for dogs than kids here.:lol:

It's become par for the course in this country, she parked in a disabled bay went into next for 45 minutes with the toddler in a boiling hot car and probably feels hard done by when she was "spoken to" by the police. These type of people usually do believe they are doing nothing wrong.
 
It's become par for the course in this country, she parked in a disabled bay went into next for 45 minutes with the toddler in a boiling hot car and probably feels hard done by when she was "spoken to" by the police. These type of people usually do believe they are doing nothing wrong.


You need a licence for a TV in your home but people like this woman get to breed when they clearly shouldn't!
 
I think every intelligent person here (I'm assuming that's only a handful, as by definition, 90% here are apparently stupid..) knows the real danger is from the evil Dihydrogen Monoxide .Lots of it in Beer..:-(

http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html
It's nasty nasty stuff Dihydrogen Monoxide, one of the most corrosive chemicals known to man...

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
 
Im with Dutto on this.

Stephen Hawking recently said that "pollution and HUMAN STUPIDITY will destroy the earth".

Been saying it for years that 90% of the British people are stupid. Only have to see the Brain dead on the phone as the drive.

i blame Flouride in water and toothpaste. its been proven to lower IQ. Its how government control the masses along with Sport.

Well, 50% of the population is below the national IQ average ;)
 
having had personal experience with MMR and autism i can tell you this mate it is YOU that are moderately misguided. I friend of mine had a perfectly normal child that could sit up and eat on their own. After having the MMR vacine they went down hill rapidly and now need 24 hour care.

Flouride is Proven to lower IQ, FACT

and NASA recently admitted that man cannot pass the Van Allen radioactive belt and didnt walk on the Moon because it was all staged.

*cracks knuckles* this science wont hurt, but it may scare you a little.

1. MMR Does not cause autism. Period. 1 case does not a correlation make, while it is unfortunate and something no parent would ever wish on another parent, the symptoms for autism appear about the time that the MMR vaccine is given. That is an unfortunate fact, and speaking as someone with a brother with both autism and serious mental handicap as well as a degree in Biochemistry and Toxicology, I have done the research, I even have a PubMed alert which emails me whenever a paper is published about Autism and MMR. I'm also a parent of a child at the age where this occurs. I had no concerns at all about the MMR Vaccine.

The original paper has been withdrawn, the author sacked and sued and HUNDREDS of further studies conducted involving HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of children to PROVE that there is no statistical correlation between MMR and Autism...

2. Fluoride doesnt lower your IQ. Again, hundreds of studies have shown that during the period of water fluoridation average IQ has actually INCREASED. Google it, investigations in the US, Canada, NZ and various countries in Europe all show there is no link between fluoridation and a lower IQ. Dont believe the bull on this one. Just dont. Its a flat out lie perpetrated by people with tin foil hats and too many guns.

3. If NASA didnt land a man on the moon, who put the mirrors there we can bounce lasers off? Why is it that one a good clear night you can SEE the landing craft on the moon with a powerful enough telescope? Forget all that actual proof, lets look at your reasonings. The Van Allen radiation belt...

The reason why NASA were talking about the Van Allen belt and having to shield against it was because they want to go to Mars and the time spent in the belt will be much much greater, thus leading to dangerous exposure levels, compared to the very low levels of radiation exposure suffered by the astronauts of Apollo missions. Thats why. NASA has never admitted the moon landings never happened, it simply said that to travel further, like to MARS they need shielding for the Orion spacecraft as it'll have a much longer exposure. No other reason. Someone took that they were working on shielding to mean that they didnt have it before and clearly this mean the moon landings were faked.

Oh and before you bring up the Buzz Aldrin tweet, his twitter got hacked.

I'm a scientist, and there is nothing that a scientist hates more than when someone cherry picks their scientific information only to suit their argument and doesnt give a full and complete picture. Science is here for the benefit of all of us, not just those who think Elvis went home, and Jimmy Hendrix and Kurt Cobain serve burgers in a McDonalds in Tuscon...
 
Well thank you for taking the time to clarify your views. I dont believe a word of it. Im sure the rockets went to the moon and left the evidence like a Drone can be flown remotely but they wernt maned.

You should watch Capricorn One, thats what really happened. Just by looking at the landscape of the moon in the so called moon landing you can see its fake, where are the craters and huge vistas?

The biggest giveaway is the lack of Stars, absolutely NONE and yet stand on a high mountain and the stars are incredible and crystal clear. On the atmosphereless Moon the Stars would have been unbelievable. And who can forget the flapping Flag in the breeze because a door was left open in the Hangar it was filmed in. Somewhere in area 51 i dont doubt.

To be honest there is so much propaganda nobody can say yes or no for absolute surety and i will leave it there.
 
This is from Harvard if you want any further proof

Impact of fluoride on neurological development in children

July 25, 2012 — For years health experts have been unable to agree on whether fluoride in the drinking water may be toxic to the developing human brain. Extremely high levels of fluoride are known to cause neurotoxicity in adults, and negative impacts on memory and learning have been reported in rodent studies, but little is known about the substance’s impact on children’s neurodevelopment. In a meta-analysis, researchers from Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and China Medical University in Shenyang for the first time combined 27 studies and found strong indications that fluoride may adversely affect cognitive development in children. Based on the findings, the authors say that this risk should not be ignored, and that more research on fluoride’s impact on the developing brain is warranted.

The study was published online in Environmental Health Perspectives on July 20, 2012.

The researchers conducted a systematic review of studies, almost all of which are from China where risks from fluoride are well-established. Fluoride is a naturally occurring substance in groundwater, and exposures to the chemical are increased in some parts of China. Virtually no human studies in this field have been conducted in the U.S., said lead author Anna Choi, research scientist in the Department of Environmental Health at HSPH.

Even though many of the studies on children in China differed in many ways or were incomplete, the authors consider the data compilation and joint analysis an important first step in evaluating the potential risk. “For the first time we have been able to do a comprehensive meta-analysis that has the potential for helping us plan better studies. We want to make sure that cognitive development is considered as a possible target for fluoride toxicity,” Choi said.

Choi and senior author Philippe Grandjean, adjunct professor of environmental health at HSPH, and their colleagues collated the epidemiological studies of children exposed to fluoride from drinking water. The China National Knowledge Infrastructure database also was included to locate studies published in Chinese journals. They then analyzed possible associations with IQ measures in more than 8,000 children of school age; all but one study suggested that high fluoride content in water may negatively affect cognitive development.

The average loss in IQ was reported as a standardized weighted mean difference of 0.45, which would be approximately equivalent to seven IQ points for commonly used IQ scores with a standard deviation of 15.* Some studies suggested that even slightly increased fluoride exposure could be toxic to the brain. Thus, children in high-fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ scores than those who lived in low-fluoride areas. The children studied were up to 14 years of age, but the investigators speculate that any toxic effect on brain development may have happened earlier, and that the brain may not be fully capable of compensating for the toxicity.

“Fluoride seems to fit in with lead, mercury, and other poisons that cause chemical brain drain,” Grandjean says. “The effect of each toxicant may seem small, but the combined damage on a population scale can be serious, especially because the brain power of the next generation is crucial to all of us.”

* This sentence was updated on September 5, 2012.
 
To protect humans travelling through the Van Allen belt of radiation you would need at least 8 inchs of Lead. Thats why NASA stated they have to work on that before sending men to Mars.

Men never went to the Moon the radiation would have killed them.
 
To protect humans travelling through the Van Allen belt of radiation you would need at least 8 inchs of Lead. Thats why NASA stated they have to work on that before sending men to Mars.

Men never went to the Moon the radiation would have killed them.


[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51DED8dcNkA[/ame]
 
It's nasty nasty stuff Dihydrogen Monoxide, one of the most corrosive chemicals known to man...



"Can using DHMO improve my marriage? This is a popular myth, but one which is also actually supported by a number of scientific facts. Dihydrogen Monoxide plays an instrumental role in the centers of the brain associated with feelings of emotional attachment and love. Married couples have found that regular ingestion of DHMO can improve their marriage-related activities, while couples that never ingest DHMO often find that their marriage suffers as well. "

Can't be much in wine. :grin: Oh no, that explains it! :doh: It's water and can in fact kill you on breathing it in, in quantities lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top