Yes, I felt it was. Murphy sent back a report which was divided into 3 separate brewing categories: Bitters & Pale Ales; Stouts, Porters and Milds; Lagers and Pilsners. I tried to scan it but they've used watermarked paper and most of it is illegible.
There is a column on the left which gives Ions (Calcium, Magnesium, Chloride, Sulphite etc) then they have columns for each of their suggested treatments. So there will be a column for AMS, one for Calcium Chloride and so on. Then they have the Raw Liquor Column which is the analysis of your water sample and then their "Theoretical Wort Values Pre Fermentation" (which is what you will have if you follow their recommendation) and finally a couple of columns with higher and lower limits for suggested targets for that group of beers. Thus for Bitters and Pale Ales, they recommend AMS 26ml per 25 litres of liquor with DWB 13g per 25 litres of beer to be made. It is very simple and though not as advanced as Bru'N'Water pretty much ***** proof.
My Anglian Water figures for my supply sort of correspond with Murphy's, but AW have some pretty wild variations. AW present their analysis as Minimum, Average and Maximum. While their range for Mg and Ca is much the same for all 3 columns Chloride has quite a big range 24,34,46 (Murphy was 28) and their Sulphate one was completely at sea 23,89,173 (Murphy 25). I phoned AW to find out what was going on, and they explained that the Sulphate one was so confusing because by law they have to include the extremes. Very, very occasionally the water tower serving us is topped up with water from the Fens which apparently accounts for the 173 reading. He said for brewing purposes I could ignore it.
So, depending on your water company you might get a pretty accurate and useful set of figures for your supply, but you might not! I didn't (still don't) really understand all the finer points of water treatment, so I found the Murphy report just what I wanted at the time (2015) when I was still a complete novice at all grain brewing.
David