If bikes are allowed to use the road then they have a right to make proper progress. Drivers of heavier vehicles have a duty of care to the more vulnerable and so, normally, it should be the driver of the motorised vehicle who is at fault. The notion that cars and buses have priority, unless they are specifically given priority or they are emergency vehicles is nonsense. Reckless driving by any road user, on the other hand, is an offence.Who's to fault if one of those on the bike overtakes in the wrong lane into oncoming traffic and gets splattered?
How many cyclists have no road sense, surly they must take a test and understand the rules as laid out in the highway codeand the point of this thread?
So this is a troll anti cyclist post then.
Cyclists don't need to take a test that is the law.
Most drivers have not looked at the highway code since taking their test even though there have been some significant recent changes.
Tests for drivers of motor vehicles doesn't seem to help....
As a wagon driver I couldn't disagree more, if I pull up at a junction and indicator to turn left no cyclists should then undertake me as the vehicle says "caution this vehicle is turning left" but they often do.it should be the driver of the motorised vehicle who is at fault.
You may not agree with the OP but there is no need for the trolling accusation.So this is a troll anti cyclist post then.
Enter your email address to join: