Intentionally aiming for low attenuation

The Homebrew Forum

Help Support The Homebrew Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

marshbrewer

Out on the marshes, wailing at the moon.
Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2011
Messages
4,942
Reaction score
4,276
Location
East Lindsey, Lincolnshire
I'm about to pull the trigger on an order for the ingredients for my Christmas brew, a Ron Pattinson historic recipe.

It calls for quite low attenuation of about 61%.

The grist is here

My plan is to use Windsor yeast and mash higher than I normally would, at 67 degrees to hopefully get lots of sugars that the yeast won't ferment.

I am then planning on fermenting at 22.

Does this sound about right?
 
How about a different yeast like wlp004. I have had quite a few stouts stick at 1020 using that so i moved onto different yeasts. Would be suitable for the grist. I am surprised by the large percentage of black malt and look forward to hearing how it comes out.
 
Thing is, I was hoping for a yeast that I know doesn't ferment maltotriose, such as Windsor, rather than stalling a yeast that might spring back to life later and produce bottle bombs, if you see what I mean.
 
This sounds reasonable to me, though I'd be tempted to budge up mash temperature a few extra degress to 69 or so to ensure it's less fermentable. 67 doesn't usually have a significant effect on my system. I don't have experience using windsor though, so others might be able to chime in with more relevant experience
 
Your plan to use Windsor should work well. There's a thread on here from last week or so where someone's beer stopped at 60% attenuation using Windsor. It wasn't what he wanted but if 60% is what you're looking for then Windsor will do.

I've not used it myself but I have heard that it's hard to get it to flocculate
 
Windsor and high mash temp should do it. I'd avoid the simple sugar as this will increase attenuation.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top