ericmark
Regular.
I started doing home brew around 2010 when my wife abandoned a brew she had started, I slowly learnt temperature was the key, a number of stalled brews due to getting too cold, and some rather bitter brews due to getting too hot, and when our fridge/freezer was condemned I moved from kitchen to garage, and used the old unit to brew in.
Now with temperature control I got no more stalled brews or bitter brews, each brew was same as last when using same kit, and any experiment I was sure results were due to what I had done, not simply too hot or too cold.
But on moving house realised Morrisons were doing 4 cans of bitter for 90p and considered was not worth the effort to set up again for home brew, being only 2% was good, it was a nice drink, which I could drink all night, with no after effects.
Then the Welsh government stepped in, price rocketed to £1.76 I think, so back to home brew. However no fridge/freezer to brew in, only a demo under floor heating tile and the thermostat so heating only, no cooling, and an old jacket to keep fermenter warm, using the flat unheated under the main house, so like brewing in a cave entrance. Never really hot or cold, but well under the 20ºC I want for brewing. So need the heat mat.
I have a hydrometer but never use it now, I just wait until air lock stops bubbling and then bottle in plastic pop bottles, so can test for over pressure, use only cold water tap as hot comes from tank in loft so may have bugs in it, wash fermenter with a sponge after each brew, but unless not starting a new one, no sanitizer of any sort, only use that if stopping brewing.
Very much minimum effort, pop bottles means only 12 bottles per fermenter, less with 3 litre bottles, so around 2 hours every three weeks gives me 2 pints a day. Which in the main is more than I drink, so stop brewing in summer until a cool day to start it.
In other words put in very little effort, and get a reasonable brew with one can kits and a bag of sugar, but 10 years ago when I started home brew used hydrometers, labelled every brew, recorded all I had done, tried using different amounts and types of sugar, and today beer is just as good with half the effort, as long as some temperature control it seems I get good results.
OK not looking for award winning, yes twin can gives a better beer, and using grain instead of kits may give more control, but for 40 pints is it worth it? OK if brewing 40 gallons very different, for one thing if 40 pints goes wrong only around £15 wasted, although not had one go wrong in ages, and the one that did go wrong, I know my error, tried larger and thought larger wasted around 12ºC not 20ºC but larger kits use tap water like any other kit, and aim is to get alcohol quickly which will kill any bugs, 12ºC OK when all water has been boiled, but not when using tap water.
And using tap water I expect every so often to get a failure, but touch wood, not as yet. So I take a very laid back approach to brewing, and it seems to work. Am I just lucky, or do others also use the laid back approach.
Now with temperature control I got no more stalled brews or bitter brews, each brew was same as last when using same kit, and any experiment I was sure results were due to what I had done, not simply too hot or too cold.
But on moving house realised Morrisons were doing 4 cans of bitter for 90p and considered was not worth the effort to set up again for home brew, being only 2% was good, it was a nice drink, which I could drink all night, with no after effects.
Then the Welsh government stepped in, price rocketed to £1.76 I think, so back to home brew. However no fridge/freezer to brew in, only a demo under floor heating tile and the thermostat so heating only, no cooling, and an old jacket to keep fermenter warm, using the flat unheated under the main house, so like brewing in a cave entrance. Never really hot or cold, but well under the 20ºC I want for brewing. So need the heat mat.
I have a hydrometer but never use it now, I just wait until air lock stops bubbling and then bottle in plastic pop bottles, so can test for over pressure, use only cold water tap as hot comes from tank in loft so may have bugs in it, wash fermenter with a sponge after each brew, but unless not starting a new one, no sanitizer of any sort, only use that if stopping brewing.
Very much minimum effort, pop bottles means only 12 bottles per fermenter, less with 3 litre bottles, so around 2 hours every three weeks gives me 2 pints a day. Which in the main is more than I drink, so stop brewing in summer until a cool day to start it.
In other words put in very little effort, and get a reasonable brew with one can kits and a bag of sugar, but 10 years ago when I started home brew used hydrometers, labelled every brew, recorded all I had done, tried using different amounts and types of sugar, and today beer is just as good with half the effort, as long as some temperature control it seems I get good results.
OK not looking for award winning, yes twin can gives a better beer, and using grain instead of kits may give more control, but for 40 pints is it worth it? OK if brewing 40 gallons very different, for one thing if 40 pints goes wrong only around £15 wasted, although not had one go wrong in ages, and the one that did go wrong, I know my error, tried larger and thought larger wasted around 12ºC not 20ºC but larger kits use tap water like any other kit, and aim is to get alcohol quickly which will kill any bugs, 12ºC OK when all water has been boiled, but not when using tap water.
And using tap water I expect every so often to get a failure, but touch wood, not as yet. So I take a very laid back approach to brewing, and it seems to work. Am I just lucky, or do others also use the laid back approach.