Hop_it
Regular.
I imagine that this topic has been covered before, but I could not be bothered to look back through 546 pages of topics to find out. So, here we go again . . . . .
I brewed a couple of days ago, and suffice it to say it was not one of my best days. The beer was a rye pale ale, using ~20% of malted rye . . . . . it's a long story Anyway, whilst struggling to get my mash up to temperature after the beta-glucanase rest I realised that it was not going to get up to the set point (in this case 66 degC). I had previously trusted the BZ readout to be reasonably accurate, and had not paid too much attention to checking it. Several hours later when I eventually got to the boil phase, I noticed that the readout was showing 102 degC. Now, I understand that a sugar solution boils at a higher temperature than water, but after doing a bit of research I found data that suggested that the change to the boiling point of a typical wort with an OG of ~1.060 is only +0.2 degC. This confirmed my growing suspicion that the temperature calibration might be wrong . . . . despite the manual suggesting that this is very unlikely.
The following day I put ~10l of water in the BZ, and heated it up to 45 degC, and set the pump going. I checked the temperature with 2 digital thermometers, and conventional mercury thermometer, and a jam making thermometer. In all cases except for the jam making thermometer I was achieving measured temperatures between 1.5 and 2.0 degC below the set level and the digital display. I then ramped up the temperature in 5 degree steps, and repeated the measurements. I got the same results all the way up to 75 degC.
So, the lesson is . . . . . Do not assume that the calibration is correct. I've now adjusted it by -2 degC to compensate for the error. Hopefully it will behave better in future
I brewed a couple of days ago, and suffice it to say it was not one of my best days. The beer was a rye pale ale, using ~20% of malted rye . . . . . it's a long story Anyway, whilst struggling to get my mash up to temperature after the beta-glucanase rest I realised that it was not going to get up to the set point (in this case 66 degC). I had previously trusted the BZ readout to be reasonably accurate, and had not paid too much attention to checking it. Several hours later when I eventually got to the boil phase, I noticed that the readout was showing 102 degC. Now, I understand that a sugar solution boils at a higher temperature than water, but after doing a bit of research I found data that suggested that the change to the boiling point of a typical wort with an OG of ~1.060 is only +0.2 degC. This confirmed my growing suspicion that the temperature calibration might be wrong . . . . despite the manual suggesting that this is very unlikely.
The following day I put ~10l of water in the BZ, and heated it up to 45 degC, and set the pump going. I checked the temperature with 2 digital thermometers, and conventional mercury thermometer, and a jam making thermometer. In all cases except for the jam making thermometer I was achieving measured temperatures between 1.5 and 2.0 degC below the set level and the digital display. I then ramped up the temperature in 5 degree steps, and repeated the measurements. I got the same results all the way up to 75 degC.
So, the lesson is . . . . . Do not assume that the calibration is correct. I've now adjusted it by -2 degC to compensate for the error. Hopefully it will behave better in future