Waylander87
Active Member
Morning all,
So I've caught the brewing bug in a big way. I did a few kits and quickly moved to an all grain setup. It's been great and given me some good beers and experience. But there are a LOT of losses in the system (7.5ltrs of deadspace in the HLT - which also doubles as the boiler, and 2.5 in the mash tun) - when I'm brewing 23ltr batches and getting over 1/3rd of losses it makes me sad.
So im beginning the process of slowly upgrading to a 100ltr setup and converting the garage to be safer (no extension leads running alongside hosepipes!!). Plan is to go all electric, get a raspberry pi/aduino temp control etc. Maybe even get it to email me when it's at temp. :geek: Everything on the same level and liquid moved by pumps. All wired into a control box out of the way. Proper job.
The idea with 100ltrs is that its future proof. In my mind anything larger is probably a full microbrewery and might need its own building!
I'll be brewing 23ltr batches still in the short term, but just on bigger kit.
As part of my scheme I noticed someone selling a 100ltr pot with tap and sight tube on ebay last night for £90. Similar ones were going for far more than that so I snapped it up.
But now I'll need to fit a kettle element. Question is, how powerful a kettle element should I be looking at? 2.5KW? 3KW? Less? More?
In two minds whether to use the 100ltr pot as the HLT or the boiler; would this make a difference to the element choice or would you suggest the same element for both pots?
As the tap is mounted on the side so there'll be some deadspace (though I imagine not as much as current setup!), so I could maybe use it as the HLT where the deadspace is just water, and then get a boiler down the line with a bottom drain? Or do you reckon a bottom draining boiler is more effort than its worth?
Mash-tun will eventually be a thermo pot when I have the funds. Given that i have a 100ltr boiler/HLT I was looking at a 70ltr mash-tun.
But as short term ill be doing ~23ltr batches still, am i going to suffer temperature losses in the mash-tun given that there will likely be a lot of air space above the grain? Is there anything i can do to limit this, such as putting an insulated and sterilised insert into the mash-tun (sit it on top of the mash or near to it) to limit the heat loss?
So i guess to sumarise my ramblings:
1) How big of a kettle element would you recommend for 100ltr HLT/Boiler?
2) Would you suggest the same size element for the HLT and the Boiler, or does one need more/less power than the other?
3) Would a boiler with a bottom drain be better than a side drain or is that overkill and faff for the sake of a few ltrs deadspace?
4) Is a 70ltr thermo-pot about right for a mash-tun or is that going to mean too much "air" in the mash-tun and heat losses as a reault?
5) Is there anything i could do to a larger mash-tun to reduce this air pocket?
Thanks in advance
Advise me oh wise ones!
Waylander
So I've caught the brewing bug in a big way. I did a few kits and quickly moved to an all grain setup. It's been great and given me some good beers and experience. But there are a LOT of losses in the system (7.5ltrs of deadspace in the HLT - which also doubles as the boiler, and 2.5 in the mash tun) - when I'm brewing 23ltr batches and getting over 1/3rd of losses it makes me sad.
So im beginning the process of slowly upgrading to a 100ltr setup and converting the garage to be safer (no extension leads running alongside hosepipes!!). Plan is to go all electric, get a raspberry pi/aduino temp control etc. Maybe even get it to email me when it's at temp. :geek: Everything on the same level and liquid moved by pumps. All wired into a control box out of the way. Proper job.
The idea with 100ltrs is that its future proof. In my mind anything larger is probably a full microbrewery and might need its own building!
I'll be brewing 23ltr batches still in the short term, but just on bigger kit.
As part of my scheme I noticed someone selling a 100ltr pot with tap and sight tube on ebay last night for £90. Similar ones were going for far more than that so I snapped it up.
But now I'll need to fit a kettle element. Question is, how powerful a kettle element should I be looking at? 2.5KW? 3KW? Less? More?
In two minds whether to use the 100ltr pot as the HLT or the boiler; would this make a difference to the element choice or would you suggest the same element for both pots?
As the tap is mounted on the side so there'll be some deadspace (though I imagine not as much as current setup!), so I could maybe use it as the HLT where the deadspace is just water, and then get a boiler down the line with a bottom drain? Or do you reckon a bottom draining boiler is more effort than its worth?
Mash-tun will eventually be a thermo pot when I have the funds. Given that i have a 100ltr boiler/HLT I was looking at a 70ltr mash-tun.
But as short term ill be doing ~23ltr batches still, am i going to suffer temperature losses in the mash-tun given that there will likely be a lot of air space above the grain? Is there anything i can do to limit this, such as putting an insulated and sterilised insert into the mash-tun (sit it on top of the mash or near to it) to limit the heat loss?
So i guess to sumarise my ramblings:
1) How big of a kettle element would you recommend for 100ltr HLT/Boiler?
2) Would you suggest the same size element for the HLT and the Boiler, or does one need more/less power than the other?
3) Would a boiler with a bottom drain be better than a side drain or is that overkill and faff for the sake of a few ltrs deadspace?
4) Is a 70ltr thermo-pot about right for a mash-tun or is that going to mean too much "air" in the mash-tun and heat losses as a reault?
5) Is there anything i could do to a larger mash-tun to reduce this air pocket?
Thanks in advance
Advise me oh wise ones!
Waylander