Search results

The point was raised that it was just a money making scheme. All the money raised goes to improving public transport. And the improvement in air quality is often forgotten or disputed on here. A good public transport is essential, I would use it, and rural pubs would like it too so more could...

ULEZ charges effectively represent a way of increasing the air quality in London. More to the point the charges are being put towards improving London transport, including a major new bus route, the Superloop, looks interesting. And I don't recall seeing any Londoner residents against the ULEZ...

I believe it's seen as the time old cars will have left the road and the revenue raised will be little

!!! !!!

Your point being that if someone is already employed it costs nothing?

have you been watching the entertainment channel GBN? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-66314338

The clue was in the statement "that humans were responsible for current climate change"

1. Interesting to see some examples of bent/distorted/politicised 2. Re ozone hole, observation and measurement is what gives the data for the climate change due to human intervention 3. As before data in the form of observation and measurement is what gives the scientists confidence to predict...

Theories by their definition are not the truth. I think you'll still find people knowing the illnesses are caused by bad spirits, so what caused you to change your mind about it, (I assume from what you say that you have). There was a major mistake that the environmentalists made some years...

Strangely NASA does believe that something is wrong. Probably disproves the previous points. Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

Don't hear sewer-ellen demanding action..

Recycle, put to better use

Money going to transport, obviously the money goes down with time, estimates say 2027 stop essentially

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/23577427.glasgows-hope-street-worst-air-quality-scotland/ explains things probably from a more balanced point.

The argument that they can't sort out public transport is just more naysaying. remove the cars and plenty of room to have enough public transport running efficiently.

If you delve further into the the removal of the LTN scheme in Newcastle you would note that the council are putting in a different LTN next year. And having good knowledge of the area I know that the removed LTN was not going to work, it's far too small an area to make a difference with...

As in the cyclical discussion, (I) increase public transport, (ii) I haven't mentioned scrappage scheme, and (iii) if it is done after a general election then there will be little against, save from the libertarians and conspiracy theorists, who by their own admission often decry the electoral...

So surely the answer is to ban all non ULEZ cars from London (& all large cities/towns) as the first step and then all non EV as the second step.

1. I see no motorway 2. I see good reason for speed restrictions 3. It was people's feedback that raised this air quality speed limit 4. from your point (it isn't stopping vehicles polluting...) I can only surmise that you wish for no non EV vehicles to be on the road or death rates from...

why is that ? And pray thee answer to the !. request, please.